this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
727 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

18089 readers
1519 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] toppy@lemy.lol 37 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is polygraph test reliable ? Doesn't it fall under pseudoscience ?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron.

That and just looking for an excuse.

[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Lol right? This seems more like a "can you beat a polygraph test" test, than a loyalty test

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

It's more of an anxiety-detector. It has no basis in fact.