this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
225 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

73042 readers
3738 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gaylactus@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's an easy one to answer. If they divorce, they have to split their possessions. If one of the partner dies, the other gets to inherit all, if no will is made to state otherwise.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Plus it isn't just about the literal stuff, it is about not letting her have any stuff. Like if he didn't keep everything, then he would see himself as 'losing'.

It's petty selfishness all the way down.

[–] Gaylactus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Correct. I was just too lazy to mention that one ;)

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If they divorce, they have to split their possessions

Better murder another human being then?! That's a foolproof plan

To me just easier to walk away with half than literally murder someone

I don't think I'll ever get it

[–] Gaylactus@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

But that's not what they are thinking. For them, they think it's easier to escape justice, otherwise, why commit a crime that lands you decades of not even the rest of your life behind bars? If that was the case, then laws would be obsolete and pointless. Laws exist not only to punish, but also to serve as deterrence. Obviously some people like this dumbass, think they are smarter and can get away!