this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
605 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

17333 readers
1077 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So, if the MRI spins at 12 RPM, does the dude also spin at 12 RPM?

Asking for a friend.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just going through comments spreading MRI information (source: I work with MRI scanners). Nothing is spinning inside the MRI machine. CT scanners have an internal spinning component, but MRIs do not.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you, I actually did not know that. While we are at it: what is causing the sounds? And how often do those machines have to be calibrated, as I believe the RF receivers (?) have to be super sensitive and accurate.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The sound is caused by ‘gradient coils’ that are being switched on and off at kHz frequency, which is in the audible range for humans. The sound is caused by those coils vibrating due to the interaction of the magnetic field with the electric current in the coils: they’re non magnetic but they still feel the ‘Lorentz force’. As far as calibration, there is a pre-scan step (which is one reason why MRIs can take awhile) used to optimize the RF settings to each patient. Patients come in many shapes and sizes so the settings have to be tuned to get a good image every time. I’m actually not sure of how often they need to be serviced, but it seems like the manufacturers are here checking on the machines pretty often!

[–] GoodTransKitty@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I imagine his head was plucked like a ripe tomato in the garden.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I doubt it, obviously depending on the applied force.

Skin is rather tough to rip with a blunt tool so yeah, maybe the head was disconnected from the spine immediately, making him look like a giraffe spinning at 12 RPM round and round.

[–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Honestly fuck this website

[–] GoodTransKitty@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Nope. Tomato theory hold up better.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The detector spins around the patient, but does the magnetic field spin too? I though not, but I'm not that certain.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Nope, the detector is separate from the magnet - the magnet encircles the patient completely, and doesn't move. I'm sure the magnetic field is affected slightly by the rotating machinery, but that should be consistent and predictable, and would be accounted for in the imaging algorithms.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Oh, TIL. Thanks!

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah I considered the supercooled electromagnert couldn't possibly rotate, but I wasn't sure if it could be modulated to change field directions or something. Didn't seem very likely. Thanks for the confirmation.