Games
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Rules
1. Submissions have to be related to games
Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.
This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.
2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.
We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.
3. No excessive self-promotion
Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.
This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.
4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.
We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.
5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW
Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.
No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.
6. No linking to piracy
Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.
We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.
Authorized Regular Threads
Related communities
PM a mod to add your own
Video games
Generic
- !gaming@Lemmy.world: Our sister community, focused on PC and console gaming. Meme are allowed.
- !photomode@feddit.uk: For all your screenshots needs, to share your love for games graphics.
- !vgmusic@lemmy.world: A community to share your love for video games music
Help and suggestions
By platform
By type
- !AutomationGames@lemmy.zip
- !Incremental_Games@incremental.social
- !LifeSimulation@lemmy.world
- !CityBuilders@sh.itjust.works
- !CozyGames@Lemmy.world
- !CRPG@lemmy.world
- !OtomeGames@ani.social
- !Shmups@lemmus.org
- !VisualNovels@ani.social
By games
- !Baldurs_Gate_3@lemmy.world
- !Cities_Skylines@lemmy.world
- !CassetteBeasts@Lemmy.world
- !Fallout@lemmy.world
- !FinalFantasyXIV@lemmy.world
- !Minecraft@Lemmy.world
- !NoMansSky@lemmy.world
- !Palia@Lemmy.world
- !Pokemon@lemm.ee
- !Skyrim@lemmy.world
- !StardewValley@lemm.ee
- !Subnautica2@Lemmy.world
- !WorkersAndResources@lemmy.world
Language specific
- !JeuxVideo@jlai.lu: French
view the rest of the comments
Perhaps, but the most I've seen are some tenuous "evidence" about him being a little selfish in WoW, not finishing games, or using his dad's influence to land a job at Blizzard. Neither of those are particularly bad, and certainly don't warrant the negative attention he got. It really seems like people are looking for dirt just because they don't like his position on SKG.
Then again, I didn't hear about him until he came out against it, and I saw he defended Godot, which is pretty rad. That's the extent of my knowledge about him, other than the handful of hit pieces against him people posted here once he got negative attention.
I support SKG and don't think PirateSoftware is a bad dude. I say just let him be, and don't watch his content if you don't like it.
The SKG thing was just the latest L in the series he’s been collecting for a while now. Similar to his wow raid there was another MMO when his party wiped due to someone accidentally aggro’ing a mob. He did the usually “that was moronic, whoever did that is kicked from the raid, etc”. Then he reviews the footage showing it was him that aggro’d and completely 180s, saying the wipe wasn’t on him. As evidenced in his SKG video, guy is super happy saying nasty shit about people but cries toxicity when it’s reciprocated. Guy just can’t help himself. Has to be right on everything and when it’s proven he isn’t, either doubles down or just simply denies being wrong.
Even the wow roaching thing, it isn’t so much the raid but the demanding everyone listen to his side before talking over others when it’s their turn and then leaving before they can have there say and tripling down. I used to appreciate some of his content but given his pattern of behaviour, including bullying, the negative attention he’s gotten is pretty deserved.
That sounds like a lot of people here on Lemmy honestly, and I think that's pretty common.
I think this is the issue. He had a lot of fans and they were let down. I think the real issue is people looking up to random streamers/influencers. It's not unique to YT/Twitch, but politicians and celebrities aa well.
I don't like it. If you don't like someone's content, don't watch it, and don't burn the place down on your way out.
The WoW thing wasn’t about being selfish, it’s just one of a dozen or more incidents of him being a narcissistic bully who screws other people over and can’t take accountability for anything.
And nobody is giving him too much shit for simply being a nepo baby. The Blizzard thing is about him being a fraud who’s been caught repeatedly lying and misleading people about his credentials and work experience in order to appear like an expert. He uses his time at Blizzard like a magic wand to expel criticism, going so far as to misrepresent what he even did at Blizzard to appear like an authority when people criticize him.
The backlash against him has been well earned by bad behavior over a long period of time, most of which involves him treating other people poorly for his own benefit.
Isn't that par for the course for streamers/youtubers though? I've seen people claim to be "indie game devs" when they've never actually released a game, or if they did, it made so few sales as to be little more than a hobby.
After some very quick research about him, it seems his dad helped him get a job as a QA at Blizzard, and then he worked his way up to doing something cybersecurity related. That doesn't scream "nepo baby" to me, that's just a dad being awesome helping their kid get their foot in the door, and my dad would do the same for me if I expressed any interest in his career. If he was given a project lead role or something right out of school, then I'd agree w/ your assessment, but a QA a not a very glamorous job, he's probably testing some boring component of their stack. Likewise, cybersecurity also isn't very glamorous, he probably ran pen-tests or something on their servers (maybe not even game servers), it's a decent job, but not something that would give him any authority since he's not making important gaming-related decisions.
That said, having worked with important people probably gives him some valuable insight, and I'd like to see him expound on why he thinks things are problematic. All I saw in the videos I watched is some hand-waving and inaccurate statements (i.e. studios would need to release code or some nonsense), which tells me he didn't actually read the petition. I didn't watch the full thing, but apparently he read the FAQ where Ross explains what the petition is not about, and he probably just skimmed that. I think that's unfortunate, since he actually has industry experience and might have something valuable to add to the conversation.
Again, I haven't watched much of his content, but I did watch what I think was a relevant part of the original VOD. Here's how I saw the WoW thing (I have never played WoW, so I'm probably missing something):
That sounds pretty reasonable. Maybe he could've said it better (seemed to be playing the "cool and collected streamer" role), but I think his actual actions were reasonable.
But maybe there's something he could have done. I don't know WoW well enough to know what options he would have had, but from my perspective, returning to help would've just meant he'd die too. And my understanding is that in this game mode, that represents a lot of investment, since the character would be deleted upon death, so it makes sense to be careful. I hear they worked it out after the stream, so his team apparently didn't think his behavior was all that bad.
And then I look at the reaction. I see several articles slamming him for his behavior in that VOD, and a lot of the backlash citing that as justification for hating him. That seems way over the top, so I think the only rational takeaway is that other streamers are making a big deal out of very little, and people are latching onto it w/o actually looking at the facts and taking what they read for granted.
That's why I hesitate to jump on the bandwagon. Maybe he's as bad as everyone says, but I haven't seen enough actual evidence of that. Each time someone has provided some evidence, I looked at it and didn't see anything damning, just normal streamer behavior. I think people are making a big deal about it because they strongly disagree w/ his take on something else (say, SKG) and are digging for dirt.
So yeah, that's my take.
No.
That would in fact make those people indie game devs. Thats not a high bar to meet. Pirate likes to word it as if he was a game dev in the industry, and often leaves the context of him just working in QA out. As for the cybersecurity role, his role dealt mostly with the human aspect of the business. Compliance, awareness training, etc. the most active things he did were social engineering phone calls. Yet he has explicitly calls himself “a hacker”.
You’re missing a step here. 3.5. He chooses not to use the items he has that would have restored his mana. Which changes number 5 a bit as a consequence.
Well you have done a pretty good job of focusing on just two of the things he’s been in hot water over, and avoiding all the other evidence that’s out there you haven’t seen. So yeah I wouldn’t want you to jump on a bandwagon without any evidence, but at the same time you’ve explained that you haven’t seen most of the evidence. So I’m not sure what the point of you weighing in here against the people who have seen all the evidence, from a perspective that hasn’t seen the evidence is.
There are hours and hours of video, photo, and written accounts of other events so I’m not just going to recap it all here for you, but it’s all out there for you to find. One of my favorites is when he’s playing another MMO on stream and a dungeon run his party does is ruined by someone accidentally pulling an extra mob. Pirate proceeds to be a huge dick about it. He doesn’t give the person who pulled it the benefit of the doubt like you have to Pirate. At the end of his rant it’s pointed out to him by his own chat that he himself was the one who pulled the mob lol. After which instead of apologizing, he then says he’s not sorry about what he did. He’s so unabashed about his view that only other people make mistakes.
That does change things a bit.
I've never played WoW and generally avoid MMOs, so I don't know how everything works. I just assumed mana items are a time effect thing, so he would've needed to plan ahead. If they were already bailing, there's no reason to use them on the way out.
Well yeah, I can't know what I don't know.
Those were the best examples provided to me, and they didn't seem as bad as people made them out to be. I just have to assume the rest is more of the same.
I'm happy to look at more though. But honestly, I don't know what you'd gain from that, I already don't watch his content and support SKG. I guess I might repost some links for others to check out if they're also confused by the backlash.
Someone else mentioned that here (today?), and that's certainly enough for me to not want to watch his streams. I already avoid a lot of the popular streamers for being disrespectful to random opponents, and doing that to someone on your team is absolutely unacceptable.
I still don't think that warrants the response he got, from calls for resignation to swatting.
I don’t think he’s been swatted. In fact, a lot of the “backlash” that Pirate has complained about has also been debunked.He said he had to step away from his role at a game publisher because people were “Reviewing bombing all of the company’s games”. Somehow he didn’t realize that game reviews are public and in the case of Steam reviews very detailed. People went right to the Steam reviews and found that literally none of the games had been review-bombed.
On the contrary, since the backlash started he’s been calling for his fans to brigade and mass report anyone who criticizes him, live on stream. He filed a lawsuit against a guy who made a game and put a cameo of Pirate in his game as a cockroach wearing Pirates signature wizards hat. (A cockroach is the wow term for people who do what Pirate did)
As for the resignation, generally companies don’t like to have people who are ongoing, unapologetic public menaces to be the faces of their company. Any consequences Pirate faces are all of his own doing. If you’re going to be a public figure, you have to understand that you’re going to be held accountable for your behavior by somebody.
I saw some "review bombing" on his game Heartbound. Long term reviews are 62% (mixed, 3000 reviews), and recent reviews are 8% (600+). When I checked a couple weeks ago when the whole thing was fresh, I swear the overall was positive.
To me, that's review bombing. The game had been out for ~7 years, and nearly 25% of the total reviews are "recent" (many since the end of June).
So my take here is that he was worried that reaction would spread to the other studio, which I guess never materialized.
That's really lame. Games should be allowed to use free expression, barring blatant slander.
I disagree, but I don't know much about him. I don't think anyone deserves to be publicly lambasted unless they truly are a public menace like Trump. Tell people to avoid his content, sure, but his work at a game studio should absolutely be unrelated, provided he's not given a platform for his unpopular views.
heartbound is his game. It’s not published by the company he resigned from. It also isn’t just people review bombing it for some unrelated reason. His game has been in early access hell for years with no sign of ever releasing to the people who’ve backed him and paid for it. And after he started getting all this attention, various developers have been digging into his code and finding out that’s it’s coded horribly, and the chances of him finishing the game with the way it’s coded are low. And in PirateSoftware fashion, he’s been having his fanbase brigade, harass, threaten, and abuse the developers who criticize his coding instead of praise it, which has only made it blow up even more. It’s not review bombing of the reviews are legitimately criticizing the game. The fact that they’re so recent is because Pirates poor behavior is putting his game in the spotlight.
Your take would be wrong. He didn’t say he resigned because he was worried about the publishers games getting potentially review bombed in the future. He said they had been review bombed, in the affirmative. Which was yet another PirateSoftware lie.
Well this keeps coming up and it’s getting really weird that you keep making the point of “Here is my opinion on something, strong enough to believe others are wrong, even though I’m ignorant to most of what’s going on here”.
Perhaps before you make any more assertions you should just go and… figure out what it is you’re talking about? I don’t mean to be rude but your opinions just mean less than nothing when they’re admittedly based on ignorance. Ive explained a lot to you here and it’s not even close to all of it. Before you go defending him more, you should see what he’s actually about.
This just feels like bandwagoning. I'm a dev with tons of years of experience and I'm sure I could get some views of I jump on the train and pull up some sloppy code. But sloppy code doesn't make something unreleasable, in fact, the browser or app you're using to read this is guaranteed to have a ton of sloppy code.
I think the main explanation is that he's not working on it actively. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if he's not the one writing the code. Maybe he is, idk.
I'm merely pointing to the huge influx of reviews since the drama started on a game that claims to have been launched 7 years ago on Steam. My understanding is that the game has been stalled for years, so why would it get so many reviews now if it's not review bombing?
I'm guessing that's where the "review bombing" claim is coming from, not from games published by the publisher he was working with.
He has a history of exaggerating and not doing proper research. I'm looking to understand why he said what he did, and my explanation makes sense to me. He probably saw a bunch on his game and a few on the publisher's other games and jumped to conclusions, which is exactly what happened with SKG.
Then I'll clarify my motivations here. I hate the internet culture of jumping down someone's throat the moment they make an unpopular statement. They go through their history and dig up random dirt, much of which is exaggerated or even blatant lies, just to smear them to ruin their reputation.
I absolutely hate that, and it contributes to the misinformation problems we have today. We should hold ourselves to a higher standard and embrace the concept of "innocent until proven guilty."
So in cases like this where there are a lot of emotions, it's especially important to look for innocent explanations before assuming guilt. YouTubers and streamers will absolutely jump on the bandwagon to get views, assuming one of the extremes because that gets views. We, as viewers, have the obligation to take a step back and look for motivations to suss out what is true from what's likely sensationalized.
I'm providing an alternate perspective to hopefully encourage others to take that step back and consider that there may be more to the story. It costs me nothing other than some time (which I'm usually spending on the toilet, let's be honest), and hopefully it helps preserve a little of what I love about the internet: open discourse where facts rule the day. That seems to be dying, so I do what I can to preserve it.
Well yeah, I'm not going to claim something is true unless I can back it up, and when I can, I usually link that evidence. I want others to follow suit and actually back up their claims instead of regurgitating what someone else said just because it aligns with their opinions. Facts should rule the day, not feels, and that's what I'm challenging here.
I don't have a strong opinion WRT Pirate Software. I don't watch his content, I don't buy his games, and I don't care what orgs he is involved with. I do care a lot about misinformation and brigading, and that seems to be happening in this case.
If you provide sources, I'm happy to review them so better informed. I've done that with other commenters, and I think that process has been helpful for everyone.
The WoW things is the most well known, be he had a similar behavior in another game, Ashes of Creation i think. Doesn't take accountability for anything. Cannot say sorry.
There's also stuff coming out here cheated on his former wife. And then was a massive manipulative dick towards the person that he was cheating on with.
Or that all his previous credentials are fabricated. Like he doesn't like giving details what he's actually done in previous jobs. He'll just state that he works somewhere and then let you fill in the blank. Or passing off what someone else did at the job as his own.
In his own channel he purposely misrepresent the recent things about him. And coding Jesus actually put out a video showing that, when he tries to reach out immediately gets filtered and banned. But meanwhile Thor is telling people that all he had to do was try to reach out...
Have you seen a popular streamer that does? If they do, it's more like "sorry you feel that way." To get a decent sized following, you need other people to see you as some kind of authority, and most authorities don't apologize, they do some amount of damage control and move on.
That's a big part of why I generally avoid popular streamers/youtubers. Most of my favorite YT channels have like 100-500k subs (and several well below 100k), and I only sub to a few w/ over 1M, and most of those are on the more humble end of the spectrum (e.g. Gamers Nexus). I don't jive well with wannabe authority figures, so I'm not surprised PirateSoftware didn't appeal to me. In fact, most of those talking head channels aren't interesting, I want facts, not opinions, and I do validate the more important facts.
Why would he? From what I gather (from a random wiki), his dad helped him get a QA job at Blizzard, and then he moved up the ranks to cybersecurity. I don't think anyone would lie about that, since those aren't "glamorous" jobs, but they are solid jobs. So my level in trust in what he says takes that into account, whatever he learned about the AAA gaming industry he learned by being present, not by being in any impactful role.
That guy rubs me the wrong way too (assuming you're talking about Cr1TiKaL/penguinz0). I've gotten through maybe 2 min of one of his videos.
Yes. I think a lot of people would reference the MatPat apology.
That's your personal bias. He lets people believe what they want. He used it for clout, and while you might not care about game development or cybersecurity, there are many who do. When he did security, he did social engineering. Which is just as valid, but if people are more impressed because they think he's looking at source code and whatnot... he doesn't correct them and leans into those stories. Since you kinda hipster-esque view of YouTubers... here's a guy with less than 1000 subs talking about it, https://youtu.be/oKadi1zy8fQ and he didn't really do that much at Blizzard either, not in game development either, but again, he doesn't say what he actually did and has a lot of stories that don't connect. That's like if I said, "Yeah, I worked at the White House for 7 years" and just left it at that. But then it comes to light, I was the one mowing the grass, and that's it. If I don't specify what I did, nor correct people, and telling stories that I overhear that belong to someone else (and I don't specify that) or talk about things that happen that I wasn't involved with... then I'm lying by omission.
Not even close. https://www.youtube.com/@CodingJesus He's a C++ developer who got his name because in some older photos of him people said he looked like Jesus. That's the whole "lore".
Hmm, never watched him. Looks like he has tens of millions of subs, which is probably why I've avoided him (I generally like smaller channels).
Maybe I just have more industry insight, because when I think of cyber security, I think of people auditing computers (do you have the corporate spyware installed?), running automated pen test suites, etc. Most of it isn't particularly technical, and most security audits I've been a part of (and we do them every year) are black box testing, meaning they don't have the code. Even in the one or two audits we did that involved the code (needed a higher tier audit for government contracts), most of what they checked was just dependency versions, they didn't look too closely at the actual code.
Outside of high profile security researchers, I see most cyber security jobs as the security guards of software dev, they make sure you keep the doors locked, but they don't force you to use reinforced doors or whatever, they're just there to tell you what the obvious weak points are.
Which pretty much everyone does. If someone doesn't go into detail, it's pretty safe to assume there's nothing to brag about.
That said, even if you only mowed the grass at the White House, you'd pick up on a lot of stuff about politics. You'd notice who the regulars are, important peoples' routines, etc, not to mention what you pick up on through random small talk with people there. There's a reason spys target people like janitors and landscapers, they don't realize how much they know so their guard is down. That's social engineering 101.
The janitors at Blizzard know more about AAA software development than the average gamer. A QA would know even more since they have more direct access to the devs and designers.
Whether you're telling the whole truth or not about your credentials is irrelevant if you can prove what you claim. That's why I'd like to see PS and Ross talk, so it would be easier to tell what's accurate from what's BS.
Ah, ok. I assumed the other guy because was pretty public with his criticism of PS and has long hair.
I haven't heard of that guy either, probably because I'm more into Rust than C++, and actually avoid C++ like the plague (I much prefer C).
Pirate has done a lot to earn hate over the years from stealing and manipulating a child back in second life to make a quick buck. Screwing over and generally being a major asshole in eve online that screwed a lot of people out of very real money.
Being a general twat, gaslighting and trying to get his community to harass people irl over the wow debacle.
Lying and giving objectively bad information over development and grifting on twitch.
He's done everything a twat really can do online short of actual physical harm.
People have grudges with him going back like 15 years. This is not his first rodeo.
Ok but... That's the correct way to play EVE online.
Really? From the 5-10 min of his videos that I watched over the last 2 weeks when trying to figure out why people dislike him, I didn't see any of that nonsense. That's really too bad if true, because he seemed like a pretty level-headed guy who was a pretty laid-back gamer (no yelling or other form of aggression, which is unfortunately common among streamers). I watched some clips of:
That's about it. He didn't seem like a toxic person who routinely trolls and screws people in games, just kind of your average, run-of-the-mill streamer who's a little low-key but still out there to create content to get people to watch.
Then again, he could totally be the jerk you make him out to be. It's really hard to tell what's a legitimate explanation of things and what's people looking for a reason to slander him because they don't like his take on SKG. The couple of articles I read seemed to mostly be the latter, but they also didn't mention most of what you did here. So idk, I guess I haven't made up my mind about him, but honestly, I don't think it's really worth digging into because I'm not into his content anyway.
There's the problem: you won't get evidence of a murder if you ask the murderer for it.
He streams a lot, so the things he says or does are spread out, especially if you're only looking for noticeably damning stuff like the rim job related rant against SKG.
His confidence and speechcraft makes him very good at steering conversations by lying or deflecting, as long as you trust what he says.
Good places to start looking may be his conversation with Dr. K or Ross' "The end of Stop Killing Games" on Youtube, both are hosted by level headed people;
I can only assume you haven't seen the latter, because at the very least it makes it very apparent why people dislike him.
This one? He sounds like an awesome dude according to his bio, but I've never seen anything by him, I'll check him out.
And I haven't seen any conversations between him and Ross. I did see snippets of his original reaction, where he seemed to completely misunderstand the petition, and his follow-up, unhinged rant, but I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on the latter because he had apparently gotten a lot of negative attention (swatting attempts, calls for him to leave the publisher he was at, and random negative remarks on his own games), so I think it's quite possible his attack on Ross was an emotional reaction to that negative attention, and not level-headed attack on Ross (I've seen nothing to suggest Ross is anything other than an awesome guy).
So my opinion on PirateSoftware is relatively neutral. He seems to be on the better end of the streamer range, which isn't saying much (lots of popular streamers are pretty toxic). I don't think he's anyone to look up to, and I wish he'd either have Ross on to discuss the petition or thoroughly read and understand it so he can elucidate his opposition to it, both of which I think would be helpful for his audience to form an actual opinion instead of borrowing his. But maybe he's on the worse end of that spectrum, I don't know, since again, I've only watched a few minutes of his content and he seemed like your average streamer who exaggerates their credentials and leans into "content," and I'm not surprised clowning on people is part of that.
I literally had not heard of him a month ago, so I'm missing a ton of context. However, nothing I've seen makes me want to watch more of his content (he's definitely not my style), but nothing makes me think he should be "cancelled" or whatever. Aside from some offensive remarks, I don't think he's really hurting anyone.
The (alleged) swatting didn't happen before "The End Of SKG".
I also don't think he deserves cancellation, but he has lied so many times, so confidently and so unrepentantly that he deservers very little credibility.
I understand that some people would feel sympathy for the somewhat excessive negative attention he got (not from me, he lost my sympathy the first time I saw him blatantly lying and lobbing insults) but with the way he ALWAYS behaved, he absolutely had some of it coming.
Yeah, that's basically what I'm pushing back on. The internet community loves to jump on people and dig up random dirt when they do something unpopular, and a lot of that dirt is exaggerated if not completely fabricated. Look at the response to the Godot tweet about being "woke" for an example of that (which PS rightly defended Godot for).
He may be a POS, but I don't think he deserves what he got. He deserves to be less popular, sure, but not much more than that.
That's why I recommended Dr. K's take and Ross', they didn't lean into the drama.
Though, most of the critiques against Jason I've heard are sound; while it's true that dramatubers search every nook and cranny of his past for slander, they find more stuff than any reasonably sympathetic person should have to be found.
he's repeatedly refused to talk to ross;
after the first video pirate software uploaded about SKG, ross left a comment offering clarifications and a chance to talk about the petition and surrounding misconceptions.
ross was refused an answer.
then PS uploaded more videos, and streams, with even more misinformation.
ross ignored it at that point and just continued doing his thing, advocating for the petition, giving updates, etc.
then it looked like the petition would fail, so ross decided there's nothing left to lose by talking about the drama with PS, and lo and behold, suddenly all youtubers and streamers were suuuper onboard, helped spread the drama, and as a consequence SKG reached its goal... because of the drama.
so a net positive overall, but sad that it's only because drama sells ads on streaming and video sites...really just a dumb state of affairs...
and to be clear: ross wasn't at all vindictive in his video. frustrated by the situation, yes, but ultimately it was a very fair and sober response.
highly recommend checking it out; from what you said so far, i think you'll enjoy the level-headed approach ross took!
here's a link to the vid
Yeah, and that's what disappoints me the most. I think suck a conversation could be productive and really suss out where PirateSoftware is coming from. Maybe there's more to it, but w/o that conversation, it just seems like he misread it and is doubling down relying on whatever meager credentials he has. That's sad, because I'm sure he absorbed something useful in his years working w/ game devs.
And honestly, that makes me want to watch those other streamers less. I used to watch SomeOrdinaryGamers, but him repeatedly getting into YT drama (and claiming he didn't like it) turned me off, and now he's apparently back on that same trend. I'm sure those other YTers have decent takes, but I just really don't like all that drama.
Ross' petition should succeed because it's a good petition, and that's obvious from the text of the petition. It doesn't need YTers to create a bunch of drama about it.
Yeah, Ross is a stand-up dude. He made a big deal about not wanting to get into drama, but that he'd do whatever was necessary, and the result was a very reasonable rebuttal. I'd like to buy him a beverage of his choice, he seems awesome.
see, I'm afraid it's simply down to money.
so I'm not convinced it would be all that productive to talk to ross.
he made the assertion, without evidence, that the petition would kill live service games, and then based everything else on that flawed premise.
it has been explained to him that this is not the case, multiple times over.
he, as an ex blizzard employee amd avid WoW player, should know exactly just how popular private servers for WoW are (used to be? haven't played in about 10 years, but used to play a lot on warmane myself).
that makes his takes especially weird, since that's a perfect example of how game preservation for live service games could look like! (although I'm sure corporate was 'not amused' by those servers at all...)
this implies to me, that his motives are not at all honorable.
the most likely explanation, which is entirely speculation on my part, is simply fear of missing out on profits, if he ever gets his game out.
or that creating his game is going to take so long (cause he spends all his time streaming instead of working on his game), that he'll basically have to start over, since by that point he probably will have to comply with the new regulations, eating into his profits.
imho: doesn't really matter what his motivations are, because his opinions are harmful to everyone enjoying games, period. and that, weirdly enough, includes himself!
so I'm not very optimistic on this point, but i would like to be wrong!
at least that would most likely be, because there's a more interesting explanation...
I'm the same!
drama turns me off content creators, not the other way around...
(i only know about the drama, because so much has been showing up in the recommendations under the videos i do watch...i have watched exactly none of the drama/reaction videos)
the problem with the streamer/yt drama machine i have specifically, is that all the creators that jumped on that particular wagon were dead silent on the initiative in the first place.
and that's the real tragedy: a whole group of people, whose livelihoods, even if they don't necessarily depend on games, are very much enhanced by them a LOT, did fuckall to support the initiative. nothing.
....until they saw an opportunity to profit off the drama!
THAT'S what gets me!
these are all people that are supposedly (and i really do believe largely honestly) passionate about games!
....until it might eat into their profits to share something that would benefit them AND their audience.
the utter lack of solidarity is what really turns me off about these people...
(well...in addition to everything else about streamers... I don't like streamers very much in general...never understood the appeal...)
yeah, but this point is an issue with the outrage-based economy of online content, not this particular case...
sucks in it's entirety, but until we manage to decouple content from ad revenue we're stuck with it.
only solution i see is to declare the internet a utility (which it obviously IS, but try telling that to the money people...)
But what's his profit motive? He makes mediocre indie games and did some undefined work (probably publicity) at an indie publisher. I don't see any material change to him financially whichever way the petition goes. He's kinda popular, but far from a big influencer.
That argument doesn't make a ton of sense to me.
This doesn't make much sense. The obligations only kick in once the game gets shut down, so either he makes so much that it doesn't matter (can keep running the servers for a long time) or it doesn't sell well and he just releases server binaries and cuts his losses. Even in the worst case (his misunderstanding), releasing server sources isn't an issue for a failed game, and a small cost to pay for a very lucrative one.
I think he's just an opinionated guy who sticks with his initial impression, even if it's wrong, and will oppose anything that sounds inconvenient for game devs (what he sees himself as). That's sadly really common, people seem to love jumping to conclusions and only really dig in if the easy assumption negatively impacts them.
Exactly! But honestly, that should be expected because their entire job is to get views.
The only one I kinda like on this subject is Gamers Nexus, because they actually approach it like journalists instead of just reacting to headlines. They'll interview companies and people to get both sides before making a hit piece. Even then, GN can rub me the wrong way when they pursue something too far.
Same. I watch only a handful:
Notice a pattern? I watch people who are better than me at a game so I can learn to be better myself. I don't watch action game streamers, mostly strategy games.
I'll occasionally watch YT videos when I either don't have time to play a game, or I am stuck and need help getting through a section.
I'm afraid that's a misconception: in most cases the obligations have to be considered during development.
in 95%+ of cases, you can't "just release the binaries", because the developers usually don't own all of their assets/code.
modern coding, and especially game dev, is highly modularized.
you usually don't build code from the ground up, if there is an existing solution for what you need. (some indie game devs still do that, but it's usually because there isn't an existing solution, or not enough budget; it's not the usual approach)
so for example, you wouldn't create your own networking solution for a multiplayer game, you'd just use an existing solution.
but because you didn't write that solution yourself, that part of the code either needs to fall under a license that allows for redistribution, or it has to be removed before you "release the binaries".
and removing such code after development is a huuuuge headache. this is something that needs to be planned for during development in most cases.
so yeah, there is some upfront cost associated with SKG, mostly in that the new regulations would need some rethinking about how to handle these code modules.
either through new or more open licenses, careful design that allows for the removal of problematic modules before release to the community, etc.
it's not a big cost, but it is there. and creating new requirements for the code, integrating that into review cycles, testing the removals, and on and on the list goes. it's mostly a management issue, but it's by no means trivial.
not that any of this is a deal breaker, but it should be kept in my mind that these new regulations are not entirely free... it's gonna cause some chaos in the industry. manageable chaos, but all chaos is somewhat expensive, when it comes to industry.
They should be, but my understanding is that there's only a penalty if they kill a game without an EOL solution, and what their EOL plans are don't need to be complete or even stay the same during development. The wording is really flexible here and allows companies a lot of room to explore different options.
If a company can't redistribute the server code, their options include (and there are probably more):
That's certainly easier to do at the start, but my understanding is that the obligation only kicks in once the servers are shut down.
And yes, it's not "free", but it's basically free for an indie shop that likely built the server from scratch or used something FOSS. And that describes PS.
yes, that's pretty much correct.
and i think i misunderstood the part about the obligations only kicking in after service ends; you are right about that.
yeah, there's a lot of wiggle room; the proposal is pretty generous!
You watched 5 minutes of his own verbal diarrhea and formed a full opinion on him?
No, I explicitly said I don't have a strong opinion on him. I'm not going to knee-jerk follow the hate train just because of a bad take on SKG and a couple of emotional videos where he said some moderately offensive things. Maybe he's really a bad dude, idk, but I'm not going to jump on the bandwagon.
Fair enough, by the way, valid point. But it does seems like you jumped on a bandwagon, my friend.
And which bandwagon would that be?