this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
821 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Adkml@hexbear.net -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So we can't post memes about ..... checks notes the general culture of our country?

So no memes about anything with literally any specifics.

You realize if you got your wish memses would just be "how many of yall like breathing"

Maybe you could point us to an example of an acceptable meme with no politics involved.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Earlier in this thread, I said:

We complainers aren’t saying they can’t post about politics, just requesting they post their political memes in the designated political meme space.

I also clarified that it has to be contentious, in a way where people condemn each other for thinking differently.

Here are some non-political memes posted in this community in the past hour:
https://lemmy.ml/post/5184036
https://lemmy.ml/post/5185652
https://lemmy.ml/post/5185650
https://lemmy.ml/post/5186256
https://lemmy.ml/post/5186204

That's 5 of the 6 memes posted in that timespan.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

1 and 3 are pretty directly political lol

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think "I don't like my job" is politically divisive. You don't really get people up in arms about it unless you're complaining about capitalism or work in general. Even boomers have their "I'd rather be fishing" meme about it.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With the division of labour, in which all these contradictions are implicit, and which in its turn is based on the natural division of labour in the family and the separation of society into individual families opposed to one another, is given simultaneously the distribution, and indeed the unequal distribution, both quantitative and qualitative, of labour and its products, hence property: the nucleus, the first form, of which lies in the family, where wife and children are the slaves of the husband. This latent slavery in the family, though still very crude, is the first property, but even at this early stage it corresponds perfectly to the definition of modern economists who call it the power of disposing of the labour-power of others. Division of labour and private property are, moreover, identical expressions: in the one the same thing is affirmed with reference to activity as is affirmed in the other with reference to the product of the activity.

Further, the division of labour implies the contradiction between the interest of the separate individual or the individual family and the communal interest of all individuals who have intercourse with one another. And indeed, this communal interest does not exist merely in the imagination, as the “general interest,” but first of all in reality, as the mutual interdependence of the individuals among whom the labour is divided. And finally, the division of labour offers us the first example of how, as long as man remains in natural society, that is, as long as a cleavage exists between the particular and the common interest, as long, therefore, as activity is not voluntarily, but naturally, divided, man’s own deed becomes an alien power opposed to him, which enslaves him instead of being controlled by him. For as soon as the distribution of labour comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity, which is forced upon him and from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critical critic, and must remain so if he does not want to lose his means of livelihood; while in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. This fixation of social activity, this consolidation of what we ourselves produce into an objective power above us, growing out of our control, thwarting our expectations, bringing to naught our calculations, is one of the chief factors in historical development up till now.

  • Marx. The German Ideology.

Tl:DR work under capitalism fucking sucks because it's exploiting us and not fighting for your liberation is politically divisive

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well by that logic, merely saying "I have a job" is a political statement.

Also I'm not reading all that, thank you.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net -1 points 1 year ago

You'd be so close if your attention span was longer than a goldfish.

Also you can't talk shit about sonething and then admit you didn't read it.

Also also were not libs so nobody is impressed by you refusing to interact with things that don't already confirm your beliefs.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net -1 points 1 year ago

"I don't like my job" is so political people bled and died to the american government for your right to not have to do it 80 hours a week as a 12 year old.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

Here let me give you the codex.

When this person says "political" they mean "things I dont agree with"