this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
1036 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

73540 readers
2674 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What if the VPS' start offering no-logs policies so it's impossible to know anything about the traffic and encryption so they don't even know whose that traffic?

This is gonna be an arms race and I don't doubt of the stupidity of the politicians. The brexit showed us how dumb they can be.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 5 days ago

No. I fully expect them to monitor the traffic from the UK. And search warrant your premises. People using VPNs are most likely going to have evidence (the keys for the VPN and ways to start it up) on the machines, in their house that they could seize. They don't need to touch your VPS.

Like I say, it'll be a rarity. It's too much work to go after people wholesale for this and the manpower to get the hard evidence it prohibitive. But, they will make a few examples.

For court purposes (and they will be careful to keep these cases in magistrate courts unless there's solid evidence of more crimes found), there will be enough evidence to show the changing traffic patterns and the proof of a working method of accessing sites from another jurisdiction present on the machines found in the user's possession. More than enough for well trained magistrates to convict.

But look, this is IF they try to route of banning VPNs too. It's just the ranting of one or two MPs right now.