this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
576 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

73503 readers
3739 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung has decided to proceed with the Bootloader blocking also in Europe, a move that has caused a lot of discussion. Behind this choice is a European regulation that will come into force in August 2025 and which risks changing smartphone usage in Europe forever. This is why other manufacturers may soon follow suit.

From 1 August 2025, new provisions will come into force RED Directive (Radio Equipment Directive), which redefines the compliance requirements for all radio devices sold in Europe. This is a significant change, not so much for the amount of regulations introduced, but for the effect they will have on the entire Android ecosystem. The issue revolves around three articles that impose specific protections: against network interference, personal data compromise, and digital fraud. These are, in themselves, sacrosanct rules.

But the crux comes with the interpretation prevailingEach device must ensure full compliance not only with the hardware, but also with the software that controls the radio modules. This is where the bootloader comes in. Unlocking it essentially allows you to replace the original operating system with an alternative one, such as LineageOS or GrapheneOS.

But these systems, if they modify the radio drivers even minimally, invalidate the CE certification. An uncertified device can no longer be legally marketed or used, at least according to the most stringent reading of the law.

This scenario has therefore led Samsung to protect its devices. Not on a whim, but to avoid any software modifications falling under your legal liability. If a user installs a ROM that interferes with radio frequencies or compromises communications security, the manufacturer (and in some cases the importer) may be held directly liable.

RED does not explicitly talk about unlocking the Bootloader or custom ROM, but it opens one regulatory space in which the margins for maneuver are they narrow. And in doing so, it provides a solid argument for those who have been trying for years to close the loop between hardware, software, and services. After all, customizing the operating system also means breaking away from proprietary services and, therefore, from the model that ties the user to the brand.

Samsung is just the first to move, but it's hard to imagine it will be the only one. Starting in August 2025, it's very likely that other manufacturers will follow suit, at least for the European market.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 37 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

PC Computers are next
This is why the big deal with TPM
Why TPM is never a removable security device
Why you can't save your old PC with a usb TPM device,
even though they are low power serial text devices

And TPM itself is just the thin side of the wedge.
It will grow more and more capable as an encrypted instructions processor
Eventually applications will run enough of their code
as encrypted instructions that they will become impossible to pirate.

This means application on your offline computer will be just as revocable as cloud application
and they will no longer be transferable, cryptographically tied to the processor core

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 36 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Here is a taste of the future

You CAN'T Jailbreak Your PC

The days of "it’s my hardware, I’ll run what I want" are over.
TPM 2.0, Secure Boot, and Microsoft Pluton are forming a closed execution environment.

You can’t replace the bootloader.  
You can’t flash unsigned firmware.  
You can’t disable the vendor-approved certificate store.

Try to run an unsigned OS, and it will simply refuse to boot.
Your motherboard no longer listens to you.
It listens to Microsoft and OEMs.


You Will Own Nothing, and Even That Nothing Is Tied to Your Old PC

TPM stores your encryption keys in a non-exportable way.
Your files, apps, and even your OS activation are now bound to your specific machine.

Want to move them to another system?
Too bad. The TPM won’t let you.
Even if you own both devices.

The machine is yours. The data, software, and identity within it are not.

Installing Linux Will Be Illegal (Functionally, If Not Yet Legally)

Secure Boot + Remote Attestation is the death knell for freedom-focused OSes.

Your distro doesn’t carry the "right" signature?
Blocked.

You modify the kernel for performance or privacy?
No longer attested.

You write your own OS?
You don’t get to boot.

It’s not banned in law.
It’s banned by cryptographic gatekeeping.

Digital preservation will be technically impossible.

Encrypted execution + hardware-tied software =
No way to archive.
No way to emulate.
No way to restore.

Games, apps, creative tools, all gone when the keys expire or the vendor shuts down.

We won’t just lose software.
We’ll lose entire cultural eras.

It's like that Apple ad crushing musical instruments but for your entire digital life

https://adage.com/video/crush-ipad-pro-apple/ (I couldn't find it unedited on youtube sorry)


You Have No Mouth and Can’t Say NO

Vendor lock-in is no longer a commercial strategy.
It’s cryptographic reality.

You can’t deny updates.
You can’t run unsigned code.
You can’t refuse attestation.

Because your software won’t run without it.

The PC has become a compliance terminal.
Saying "no" is no longer supported behavior.

A hardware-enforced, cryptographically sealed cage.

Your freedom to compute is being revoked—quietly, efficiently, irreversibly.
The illusion of ownership is maintained only until enforcement becomes total.
This isn’t theory. It’s shipping now.

If we don’t fight back, there will be no root access left to reclaim.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

What a fucking bleak run down. But it is the direction things are barreling towards.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Writing this the warning of Cory Doctorow about an upcoming "War on General Computing" was ringing in my head !

And also this video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmstuO0Em8

But he doesn't talk about the TPM and cryptoprocessor threat or the "war on general computing", it was in another video that I can't find right now

I also can't find the Apple Ad where they crush a piano and other instruments of creation under a giant press to make an ipad

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I remember seeing that ad. It was super depressing. I hate what the tech world is coming to, why my next phone will be a dumb phone, I'm trying to buy dvds and keeping my circa 2017 vehicle running for as long as possible

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago

The future is here but it's not evenly distributed.
Hopefully we can stay alive in the future's shadow.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

But if it doesn't run Linux I am not going to buy it

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Microsoft is fine if you don't buy computers anymore
It won't miss you in particular

This is what's going to happen with PCs
https://lemmy.ml/post/33992840/20208076

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

And the Linux foundation will just sit by letting it happen? Or Valve for that matter, they appear to have anticipated this risk over a decade ago.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 10 points 19 hours ago

Yes, Valve saw this possibility back in the days of Windows 8

But look at phones, the supply chains mostly delivery bootloader locked and unlockable devices.

And now the latest windows require TPM 2.0

It requires TPM 2.0 to be married to the CPU, non user removable

Microsoft Pluton is an early version of a crypto processor.

They are putting the pieces in place slowly
and they have all kinds of good reasons
"why this isn't something you should worry about"

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 9 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

RISC-V's time to shine! (IIRC it is open source instruction set).

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And time to hold on to old devices. They'll become like old cars: the only ones the owner can fully control.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Storage and processors don't last forever. As parts break down, you won't be able to replace them. Need a new hard drive? Sorry, it'll only talk to motherboards that shake its hand.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

RISC-V you are our only hope,
only use open source BIOS
Never factory bootloader-lock !

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

It is an open source architecture but it doesn't prevent the OEM from adding anything to it to prevent user from doing anything on it. They can add TPM, locked bootloader with fixed signing key stored on board. They can add microprocessor inaccessible to anyone but OEM. They can add spyware, malware. All this without any need for declaring it or need to make it open source.

The only change RISC V brings is there is no need to pay for a hardware architecture, benefitting the manufacturer. Rather than bringing freedom to the user.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

They probably want that, but also at the same time, that would kill software development.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

They would like it if only their employees were the only priesthood of all software development

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

Only approved AIs and humans carrying a corporately issued developer license will be allowed to develop software.