this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

76564 readers
2876 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
2
Bluesky sees record signups day after Musk says X will go paid-only (mashable.com)
submitted 2 years ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform's entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website "Bluesky Stats." Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It's impossible to know whether Musk's comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Google+ did the same thing when it rolled out, then they tried to force people to use it before they cancelled the project.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In fairness, Gmail had a similar invite system when it launched and that's been way more successful than G+

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Gmail was also both "federated" and an insanely good product compared to its contemporaries. G+ had a couple of interesting innovations, but it wasn't all that special and invite-only on a closed ecosystem is very iffy.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Gmail was literally the best. 1GB space at launch when you'd get a dozen MB in Hotmail and others, slick fast UI in a browser.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Gmail was invite only at first probably because Google didn't want it to grow faster than they could buy hard drives. It gave you a gigabyte of email storage which at the time was huge. I'm certain they did that for technical reasons.

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

"i am the choosen one!" As if...

Boy, our servers are ducktaped!