this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
155 points (100.0% liked)
Games
20891 readers
422 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
“We made a deal in which they had to successfully launch the game and get a big payment when they hit certain revenue targets, but we had to fire them because they only wanted the money for which they had to make a good game, they didn’t wanted to make a good game, they were in only for the money, for which - again - they had to make a good game, they were clearly sabotaging the game!”
They are so full of shite. Corporate BS 101.
I genuinely don't know what about your comment is supposed to be mocking.
You're just describing the situation presented in purposefully more confusing language than the article.
They rephrased Krafton's BS corporate speech into the plain English meaning. It's only confusing because what Krafton is claiming is asinine.
No, Krafton's explanation was clearer and plainer spoken.
Krafton may be lying or misrepresenting the situation, but their explanation is both simple and believable, if not necessarily the truth.