this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
1133 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

74324 readers
3446 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Capitalism is grand, innit. Wait, not grand, I meant to say cancer

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I feel like half of the blame capitalism gets is valid, but the other half is just society. I don't care what kind of system you're under, you're going to have to deal with other people.

Oh, and if you try the system where you don't have to deal with people, that just means other people end up handling you.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 14 points 3 days ago

In this case it is purely fault of the money incentive though. Noone would spend so much effort and computation power on AI if they didn't think it could make them money.

The funniest part is though that it's only theoretical anyway, everyone is only losing on it and they're most likely never gonna make it back.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It matters a lot though what kind of goal the system incentivises. Imagine if it was people's happiness and freedom instead of quarterly profits.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

That’s the part people never really seem to understand. It makes sense though because we’re subjected to the system from birth and it’s all a lot of people know so they can’t grasp the idea of a world outside of that so it can sometimes be difficult to get through to people on that

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine if it was people’s happiness and freedom instead of quarterly profits

  1. Whose happiness and freedom?
  2. How is it to be measured?
  3. Capitalists honestly believe that free trade is the best albeit flawed way to do both of the above

It's definitely valid to disagree about point #3, but then you need to give a better model for #1 and #2

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago
  1. Optimise for maximum happiness and freedom and minimum suffering on a societal level, while making sure that a certain threshold of freedom-from-suffering is met for every single individual. (So that happiness for the majority is not reached via the suffering of minorities.) Obviously there can be arguments about where we draw the lines for the specifics of these.
  2. Quite a few ways have been developed to measure happiness, wellbeing, flourishing, quality of life, whatever nuance you want to pick.
  3. We have ample proof that it's a system that fundamentally undermines societal happiness by incentivising the accumulation of wealth at the expense of the wellbeing of people and ecosystems. It's decades overdue to radically change the way the world's economy works. (Which is of course not something those with the most power want, so unlikely to happen any time soon.)
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Could you clarify on what you mean with “dealing with people”? I’m not really sure the point you’re trying to make with that

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The complaint that got blamed on capitalism was:

The information age gave way for the misinformation age, where everything is fake.

and if there's one entity/person most responsible for that, it's Putin or the GOP. Most of it is political, and very little to do with capitalism itself. Except that capitalism surrounds and is intertwined with everything.

Still, if you get rid of capitalism, it doesn't get rid of politics. I'd argue that the root of the issue is the GOP trying to hoard power (money and otherwise), and power is going to exist with or without capitalism. Is North Korea capitalist? Do they have issues with disinfo?

This Christian Sharia Law movement doesn't exist for money.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Capitalism itself is political. But the point I was making was that capitalism was the driving force of enshittenfication of all our technology that could be used for helping us all but instead it’s only about profit. Which is capitalism..

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Two of the largest drivers are religion, christians wanting their Sharia Law, and Russia taking political control of the US.

Capitalism is in the top three, sure. It's also part of the driver of that technology.

I don't think we should worship capitalism as we have, but I don't think getting rid of capitalism as a whole solves more problems than it creates.

Give me capitalism with heavy socialist controls and political separation please, thanks. The general idea of using money as a measure of what society owes you isn't terrible. It's allowing that measure to get so out of whack and have such inordinate control of everything that is the problem.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I would give this reddit gold

Instant easy complaints help-i'm-oppressed-by-Capitalism today sound an awful lot like the instant easy complaints help-i'm-oppressed-by-Communism I used to hear from rednecks

Ask someone who starved & died under either system how obviously superior it is, you will find millions on either side

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

What if i'm being repressed instead?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Also consider that Socialism is totally legal under Capitalism. Want to start a co-op? Go for it. Want to legislate and implement socialized healthcare? Many Capitalist countries have.

Under Communism, Capitalism must be illegal and stamped out by force. Want to start a business making shoes and hire someone to work for an agreed upon wage? Illegal.

When the goal involves guaranteeing positive rights, I'm not sure how it can be achieved without coercion. Which is how any socialist policies get implemented under capitalism anyways.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

ofc a lot depends on the precise definitions of terms, state corporatism is not synonymous with generally free markets operating under the regulation of a basically diverse inclusive democracy -- but both are referred to as "capitalism"

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The neat part is that anything bad that happens under capitalism is capitalism's fault, but anything good that happens is actually socialism happening in spite of capitalism, somehow.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Could you give some examples?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And in what way does capitalism socialize healthcare in the United States?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Socialized healthcare exists there -- at least until the current administration finishes ripping it away

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The US uses a welfare state, that isn’t socialism and no one is praising it

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Socialized healthcare isn't socialism...

Interesting.

How about Canada?

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The US does not have socialized healthcare. It uses a welfare state. What about Canada?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does Canada have socialized healthcare?

Does anywhere?

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah they do! A few places do. I’m just enjoying seeing you prove your own sarcasm as actual truth because these things formed in spite of capitalism

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are you willingly ignoring my point or just not getting it? Oh well

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like you just realized you proved mine.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you’re simping for capitalism then I guess I’m not surprised you’ll take whatever narrative and run with it.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol can't engage with someone's point? Just call them a simp.

Why did you even engage if you can't walk the walk, lil bro?

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You: “capitalism is the reason we have everything! And when people get sick of capitalism’s greed and form social policies to help the labor class because they continually get exploited in spite of capitalism, somehow that’s capitalism’s fault!”

But then the irony is lost on you

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Whoever you're shadowboxing there is taking a hell of a beating!

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for exemplifying the "CaPiTaLiSm BaD" person from my original comment so well! The total inability to engage with my comment to the point of inventing a whole new one to argue with was a really nice touch!

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All you did was exemplify the “capitalism is great” person that I was pointing out :)

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh wow, "no u".

Devastating comeback.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If the shoe fits. It’s just too easy to play with you

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol okay. Have fun LARPing, comrade.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Capitalism isn’t your friend and will never serve you 😘

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If only you understood anything you were talking about. Oh well!

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah it sure is a shame lol