this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
113 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

75265 readers
3673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

AI isn't going to take anyone's job.

We will fire a bunch of workers while delusion nepo babies try to figure out why an autocomplete bot can think critically or do any complex tasks, then they will close their buisness or rehire people after a few years of failure, and it won't impact the owner's quality of life in any way because they have more wealth then they will ever need

We should absolutely have a UBI that's funded by taxing 100% of wealth over a set number and redistributing it perpetually.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Agreed for the most part, but I disagree about the 100% taxes thing. I think we should instead cap inheritance/gifts, not income. You can be as wealthy as you want, but once you die, it all goes back to the common pot.

I don't care about rich people, I mostly just care about generational wealth.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, those are kinda two sides of the same coin. Both ways to limit the compounding of wealth in few hands.

I'm open to all these ideas, and more

[–] PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Wealth and income are two different things. We should tax wealth savagely, i.e., the ownership of assets, and we should also tax income, but to a lesser degree.

Just to level set: income refers to the flow of money earned over a period, like a salary or wages, while wealth represents the accumulated assets minus liabilities at a specific point in time

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)