this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
1209 points (99.0% liked)

Games

41647 readers
1458 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyone know if this is true or not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, I kind of guessed this way back when Collective Shout pushed their action.

I actually had a comment removed here on Lemmy when I brought up how this was "US politics/elections affecting your life as gamers", because the mods insisted it was purely an Australian action, and my comment was off-topic. But we live in a global online world. There's no way that US politics wouldn't have a huge effect on this type of censorship.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There’s no way that US politics wouldn’t have a huge effect on this type of censorship.

I've been called a fearmonger also for trying to tell apathetic gamers who "hate politics" that if they don't get involved they're going to start losing their own goddamn games.

I have linked the "Conservapedia" articles on video games all over reddit until they banned me. I have tried to tell people that voting for Trump or supporting his ideals even distantly isn't going to "take the woke out of your games" that it will actually crush your gaming entirely, because... and I can't stress this enough, Conservatives HATE GAMING. Not the online chuds and 4channers who hate women, they're barely even conservatives... they're fodder for the online fights. But the old-guard and middle-class conservatives who get marching orders from churches and grifters, the ones who have all the actual money on the right. They want to see an end to "distractions" and fiction and fantasy and everything that isn't some kind of sanitized, un-nuanced devotion to Dear Leader and his United States of White Jesus.

Fiction has been an enemy of power since writing began, and games are just another kind of fiction that lets people stretch their imagination. This is why it's dangerous, this is why they want to see it ended.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 2 hours ago

Fiction has been an enemy of power since writing began

x for doubt

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Conservatives HATE GAMING. Not the online chuds and 4channers who hate women, they're barely even conservatives...

They sure sound like conservatives to me.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

I mean, they are in the moment that they're mad that someone made a black female with realistic proportions as a selectable character... but they largely don't have principles or values at all, they're a slime-mold that fits into whatever social trend is easy to latch onto right now so they can share emotional connection with their peers.

What happened is we ignored them and people like Steve Bannon and Russians and other agents of regression saw them as a ripe target for exploitation and manipulation. We have a massive rise in things like incels and anti-woke young men, but it's largely manufactured. These are mostly young people who are unhappy, alone and they've been nudged towards easy-to-digest memes and talking points that this is the fault of unattractive feminists who want to take their games away.

This isn't "conservatism" as much as reactionary attitudes and social isolation. If we were able to get a foot in the door faster and have a concerted effort to show them that their issues are largely socio-economic and mental-health related, we would have made a lot more progress a lot sooner. Source: I used to do just that and mentored/coached lonely young guys for years, they're staggeringly easy to turn if you make the effort and are social and can listen to people.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Terminology is confusing. Lowercase-c conservatives want to keep the status quo as it is. But fact is that e.g. in the USA, legal access to abortion has been the status quo for 50 years.

So nobody can say that the status quo has been anything but that in the US. So uppercase-C “Conservative” just means “reactionary” now, because that's what it is to roll back a 50 year old right.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is as it always was: Even if you have no interest in politics, the politics are interested in you.

Ordinary people should adopt politics as a hobby, if only to have agency about which type of politics thrives or dies. I would much prefer sex-positive media to proliferate over sex negative, because the latter will take away my hentai games and manga. Furries, queers, and genuine perverts, all of them should have a shared interest of putting conservative values into a pine box, with a bit of stake and garlic.

Furries, queers, and genuine perverts, all of them should have a shared interest of putting conservative values into a pine box, with a bit of stake and garlic.

And facing towards the earth with their head decapitated and placed between their legs. Kudos in advance if you know what that means.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No matter how you measure it, global sexually repressive puritanism always traces back to the US.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There are a lot of people that are capable of suppressing women without the US just fine. Just have a quick look at the Arabic peninsula, or the Taliban.

Western securely repressive puritanism, maybe.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is Iran in the 1970s, before the US started providing weapons, training, and funding to groups like literally the Taliban.

[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow, I've never seen this before. I don't mean this in a derogatory way or anything, but they look like people.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

It's why iran has so many educated women and is weirdly technologically powerful for a theocratic regime. Iran in the 70s was modern. Inshallah the people of iran will be freed from the tyranny of theocracy.

But yeah, iran is what should scare you the most because their collapse was fast and unexpected.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They still are, they're just people that are repressed by a theocracy now.

[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know I just mean to say that nowadays they've had all of their humanity stripped away, they look more like machines than they do people.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but remember they're still fighting. Feminist protests break out every few years there.

[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Good, they deserve their freedom

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, we funded both Iran and the Taliban. We even elected a guy who illegally funneled weapon sales to Iran in order to take that money and give it to Nicaraguan death squads. Arguably, without US support, neither gets the critical mass it needs to effect regime change or become anything more than an upstart.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Taliban hated women long before being funded by the US, and hating women was not why they are funded. Same for the fundamentalist Iranian Muslims.

Them being in power (and the subsequent suffering of women) can be attributed to the US, but not them hating women per se.

I like hating on the US as much as anyone, but let's not pretend they're the source of all evil (only lots).

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Without the funding, most of those people would believe different things.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The women in the middle east weren't nearly as suppressed before the US got involved

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US is still the leader of the West, whatever its policies are, they will greatly affect the people in these countries.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US isn't a leader in anything they are imperialist and they meddle. It's not leadership it's influence. They've consolidated political, economic, and military power and they use all of those to varying degrees to meddle in everyone's affairs

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Let's discuss semantics instead of the hegemony they still have over our countries as they descend into a dictatorship and drag us down with them.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

It's not just semantics the idea that the US is leading implies passive influence rather than active influence.

They're leading not through inspiration and innovation but as they would with a leash.