this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
75193 readers
2784 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Memphis is on the Mississippi. Evaporating the volume of the Mississippi at Memphis with graphics cards would be a pretty impressive feat.
kagis
https://snoflo.org/flow/report/tennessee/
345,000 cubic feet of water per second is a pretty substantial amount of water.
EDIT: Water has a heat of vaporization of 2.23 kJ/g.
345k ft³ water is 9.7×10⁹ cm³, so 9.7×10⁹g
That's about 2.2×10¹⁰kJ to vaporize it (disregarding the specific heat of water, just the heat of vaporization).
1kJ ≈ 0.28 Wh.
So 6,160,000,000 Wh to vaporize the water going through in a second.
3,600 seconds in an hour.
So at a flow rate of 345k ft³ that'd sink about 22 trillion watts through vaporization alone.
https://www.e-education.psu.edu/egee102/node/1925
8760 hours in a year. So global average power usage is about 21 TW.
If we put the entire world's generated electricity towards heat to vaporize the Mississippi at Memphis, it'd still fall a bit short.
EDIT2: I also inadvertently transposed two digits (should be 354,000 ft³/sec rather than 345,000 ft³/sec) in transcribing the initial flow rate, so it'd fall slightly shorter.