this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
314 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

75265 readers
3671 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If cheap(er/better) energy is invented then that's good, why would tech corpos be able to "hold the reins" of it exclusively?

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, patents and what have you are a thing. I’m mostly thinking that I wouldn’t want e.g. Facebook to run any nuclear reactors or energy grids. That’s something I prefer the government does.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nuclear reactors already exist, that's not new tech.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m not saying it is. I’m saying that predatory companies shouldn’t run critical infrastructure.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We were talking about inventing, not running though.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

My comment is in the context of this

Also interesting that we’re ignoring something here – big tech is chasing cheap sources of clean energy. Don’t we want cheap, clean energy?