this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
433 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74524 readers
6210 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Starting next year, Google will begin to verify the identities of developers distributing their apps on Android devices, not just those who distribute via the Play Store.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is awful. One of my favorite differences between Android and iOS, as both a user AND developer is sideloading.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The closer google gets to apple, the more similar they become. Except apples shit generally all works well together. Knock off air tags, chromecast, audio groups, and so many other things are riddled with bugs and never fixed.

If you make android the same as iOS, I might as well switch.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Only reason I stick with Apple is because their stuff simply works and is supported (in most cases) for almost 10 years.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Sideloading still works, just the apps have to be signed. Still awfull.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How many great apps will we lose because of this, though?

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What's extra funny is that I already did all of this, and yet, I've been informed that my developer account is subject to deletion because I'm not active enough. Since my game does not get regular updates I said F this, let them delete my account. It's still available for sideload on itch.io anyway. Jokes on me for believing that.

So yeah, it seems like Google is actively hostile towards building a library of software/games that just work and intentionally only wants live service garbage apps on their platform because those make more revenue.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I'd say a big ton of them :(

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I highly doubt they'll sign Torrent clients.

(Yes I torrent on my phone, cuz why not lol :P)

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

Torrent client is just an application, author shouldn't be responsible - naive thinking I suppose

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Torrent clients are not illegal in any way. So why not?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Idk, apple doesn't allow them on their app store.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Right sorry. I thought you meant developers won't sign them. Obviously you mean Google.

I hope Google at least will only sign identities, e.g. you really are DeathByBigSad and this is your key which you can sign apps with. Not look at the apps themselves. That may be too much to hope for. :(

[–] Integrate777@discuss.online 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can Nintendo request Google revoke authorization for emulator developers? Or publishers requesting revoking any of the hugely popular manga aggregator apps. Or maybe they'll just outright refuse them from the start, like they will with revanced.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago

I'm on your side and you are correct, besides Google amassing a ton of money (each registration costs $25) they will have total control and we know that Google is far beyond "not evil".

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

none of those apps would receive authorization in this scenario. you would not be able to use them

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We just need to find a way to fake it, I guess anyone that wants to sideload has to root.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

The only way to fake it would be to use a "public" signature, but then again, I'm sure google will revoke them eventually. I guess rooting won't be enough, one would have to change some internal binaries. Perhaps it's time for a ungooglified android OS 🤷‍♂️