this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
154 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

74827 readers
2769 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36866515

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see this line of thinking as more useful as a thought experiment than as something we should actually do. Yes, we can theoretically map out a human brain and simulate it in extremely high detail. That's probably both inefficient and unnecessary. What it does do is get us past the idea that it's impossible to make a computer that can think like a human. Without relying on some kind of supernatural soul, there must be some theoretical way we could do this. We just need to know how without simulating individual atoms.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

It might be helpful to make one full brain simulation, so that we can start removing parts and seeing what needs to stay. I definitely don't think that we should be mass-producing then, though.