147
NHS surgeon who had his legs removed to satisfy sexual interest is jailed for fraud.
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
147 points (96.8% liked)
Not The Onion
18374 readers
1751 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Isn't it that he was the surgeon? So he billed the insurance for himself and paid himself the money. Instead of the money going to the hospital and some portion of it going towards his paycheck, but most of it going towards the cost of running and supplying a hospital with all the tech and tools they need to stay current and have competitive success rates.
Or did he just claim disability or something by way of accident instead of by choice, to get a higher disability insurance pay out?
Either way, fraud is basically any time you lie to get money, criminal fraud is when you lie to get enough money that the police care. And it certainly seems like he lied to get more money than he was entitled.
I would be very impressed if he surgically removed his own legs. I mean, there is a lot of tissue and bone to cut through. That's not easy to do by yourself. But if that's the case, that's where the fraud aspect could come from.
Also, is that a thing? "Disability by choice" so you get a lower payout? But even if, wouldn't that be paid by some other insurance - like a specific disability insurance rather than your typical health insurance? At least in Germany the latter is very much different, health insurances only pay for treatments, recovery and prevention.
The lie about the cause of the injury must somehow be related to the payout, otherwise I can't believe how it would constitute fraud. Still, this is really confusing because private health insurances usually cannot decline/reduce claims due to intentional injury.
Its possible to do but you gotta do a lot of yoga.......
Also, it looks like "old mutual health" was recently re-branded to "ReAssure" in the UK, so that would be who to look up for what type of insurance they would provide. It does sound like they were life insurance, or "life assurance" as they called it. Sounds very much like disability insurance would be under their umbrella.
No, that's Old Mutual Wealth which rebranded. Wealth, not Health. Maybe this is a mistake in the article?
Oh, as far as I could tell they were part of the same company, the health was an umbrella with the wealth one under it.
Huh, you're right but the umbrella company was still only called "Old Mutual".
That makes more sense.