this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
849 points (96.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12368 readers
316 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 84 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Taylor Swift doesn't need the Superbowl.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Conservatives are so out of touch that they think that Taylor Swift still needs a platform after a record breaking music tour. If anything, she is the platform that the NFL needs for a female audience, not the other way around.

[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She can have a regular owl like the rest of us.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You have an owl? Funny i never got mine.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Rachael: Do you like our owl?

Deckard: It's artificial?

Rachael: Of course it is.

Deckard: Must be expensive.

Rachael: Very.

I can't even afford an artificial owl. :(

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, I imagine it'd be a cool brand name for oversized toilets.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 10 points 9 months ago

I prefer the owls

[–] tuxtey@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I'm almost certain she can just buy a Superbowl now