this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
849 points (96.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12985 readers
1182 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Taylor Swift doesn't need the Superbowl.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Conservatives are so out of touch that they think that Taylor Swift still needs a platform after a record breaking music tour. If anything, she is the platform that the NFL needs for a female audience, not the other way around.

[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She can have a regular owl like the rest of us.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have an owl? Funny i never got mine.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Rachael: Do you like our owl?

Deckard: It's artificial?

Rachael: Of course it is.

Deckard: Must be expensive.

Rachael: Very.

I can't even afford an artificial owl. :(

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, I imagine it'd be a cool brand name for oversized toilets.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago

I prefer the owls

[–] tuxtey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm almost certain she can just buy a Superbowl now