this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
776 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

75265 readers
3655 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 139 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Given Reddit's past unreasonableness, I wouldn't be surprised if this otherwise reasonable explanation has an alternative motive.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 57 points 2 days ago

While ulterior is probably a better way to say that alternative motive also makes sense given the context.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, I wanted to say that but I couldn't figure out how to spell it.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

That's what I guessed. Alternative is a fine alternative word though.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] logi@piefed.world 11 points 2 days ago
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The motive is these mods hold a decent amount of power on the platform that they wish to reduce. They don’t want a repeat of the API protests.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now /u/spez will have all the power

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah that is exactly it. They didn't want mods to be able to disrupt the site again, so they're looking to make that more difficult.

God, I am so glad I left that place.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Gotta boost user numbers.

Or obscure them considering not letting people see sub count only daily/weekly activities

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 8 hours ago

Total subscriber number is useless, daily/weekly/monthly active users is infinitely more important and useful.

[–] ronl2k@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The user numbers were bogus anyway since Reddit didn't automatically decrement the user number after banning a member. The banned member had to manually unjoin the subreddit. So the membership count was inflated with banned members.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago

That's it. It's the illusion of fairness and it takes away reddit jannies' ability to show off their powermod status, and that's the only incentive they have not to use sockpuppets for every sub they mod.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is actually another of Reddit's decisions that I'm in agreement with. Subscriber count isn't a very useful number, it largely just measures how old a subreddit is. You can already see how old the subreddit is much more accurately by looking at its founding date.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they'd added, yes. But removing it completely is just a way to hide how many are on the platform.

Or left in a protest

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 8 hours ago

You’ve got that backwards.

Active users are literally all that matter. When a user is banned permanently from Reddit, they aren’t unsubscribed from any subs. They’re still included in the total subscriber number.

Showing total subscriber numbers is hiding the details. Showing active user counts is the opposite.