this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
881 points (94.9% liked)

Greentext

4459 readers
730 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Similar thing happened with cars. My grandpa would take them apart and reassemble them. my dad (somewhat generalizing to generations a bit) were really into cars and engines and would do some basic diy. I know nothing about them and don’t care to learn much.

I think computers are doing a similar thing. Millennials sit in the middle of the adoption and saw it emerge from more of a technology wild Wild West to being central to modern society. We could take the time to delve into details (since they mattered), but now it’s more taken for granted and things are there.

I guess, I’m just thinking it’s some sort of technology adoption thing that naturally plays out in a “victim if it’s own success” way.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

That’s such a good point. Kind of blew my mind with it haha.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago

I would guess that's it's a combination of what you mentioned and also the generation rasing it not bothering to actually teach them properly about that sort of stuff. I never learned about car stuff, never had anyone to teach me. Now as an adult I know enough to do the basic oil change stuff but nothing more.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes but unlike ChatGPT giving you made up answers, cars don't drive you to 200 km away from where you wanted to go on their own. At least not yet.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh, that's definitely happening when the five-years-away promise of fully self-driving vehicles as promised a decade ago make their appearance in 2050.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Don't forget they'll be optimising the route to pass the store fronts of 3 paying businesses along the way.

[–] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think the situation is also somewhat different with cars. Old cars used to be much simpler to take apart and tinker with than modern cars. Computers and operating systems are still just as easy to pry apart (since the fundamentals haven't changed since the 90s lol).

My theory is that as tech came to a wider appeal and became more user-friendly, more people are using it who don't run into issues that need technical knowledge. Early OSes needed highly technical knowledge to use. Modern OSes can be operated by a monkey. Therefore, their inclination to learn about the computer is less because it just fades into the background.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I think you have some good points, but I’m not 100% sure I agree though. Modern computers are much more complex than earlier ones if the 80s and 90s. (I guess I’m ignoring the earlier VAXs and stuff and thinking more of personal computers.) I saw a keynote from an OS conference which was pointing out that there are very few actual os papers, as the hardware is so much more complex and actually multiple smaller os’s managing the various system on chip components.

Also, Mac has over the years gone to great lengths to hide how things actually work. Like 5 years ago I remember getting really confused just attaching a debugger to a c simple C program I was toying with.

At the end you say that OSs are so easy monkeys could use them, and I think that’s my point too. They intentionally get easier to use and fade into the background and don’t really encourage tinkering with the lower level stuff.

You are correct that the basics of computers are similar and that’s why arduino and other microcontrollers are still basically the same as they were years ago, just the main difference I’ve seen is moving to more and more RTOS and trading off a bit of speed and memory, whereas a decade ago it was a lot more low level assembly optimization.

Good points though! I appreciate them. I teach some computer engineering stuff and I think about a lot of this and how best to talk about some of the lower level stuff.