this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
842 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

75295 readers
4140 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 156 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Is it not already a propaganda mill by convention? I assumed that was part of the deal to continue operating.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but... not the right propaganda!

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

right propaganda

Well...

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago

Yeah I thought this deal happened months ago. I guess now they're being public about it.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Before it was a vague sinophobic conspiracy theory pushed by big tech and other fascists... Now it's a reality.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The only time I ever hear the term "sinophobic", it's someone using it to hand-wave away criticisms of the Chinese government.

Sort of like "anti-semitic" and criticisms of Israel.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Didn’t you invalidate your own comment though?

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You should read the comment you replied to then. Or is it your own you’re confused about?

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The person I replied to was saying that the idea that Tiktok was a Chinese propaganda machine was a "vague 'Sinophobic' conspiracy theory", and I'm pointing out how they used 'sinophobic' to dismiss a legitimate concern about a state government. Much like people use "anti-semitic". Or "Russophobic".

What are you confused about? How did I invalidate my own comment? Please elaborate.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

You dismissed sinophobia by admitting you dismiss the existence of sinophobia. Both in your first comment, and your most recent one.

If you recognized the sinophobia pointed out to you, your comment would invalidate itself. It seems, however, that you are unable and/or unwilling to do so, which takes away credibility from the rest of your claims.