this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
403 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

18351 readers
895 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@olio.cafe 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I suspect that if employees at Meta who are tasked with hoovering up training data from everywhere they can find are just watching porn, it probably won't go over well on their annual reviews.

I would give good odds that the human at Meta most-closely responsible for the BitTorrent download at issue probably has never even seen this particular torrent by name or URL. The scope of data involved in training is too large for direct human involvement. They probably did something along the lines of writing a bot in Python or similar to spider websites and feed every torrent it could find into a torrent downloader. That downloader's output then gets dumped into some massive internal collection of data that gets used by some other team as part of the training process. The humans just create tools and set them in motion, never actually see the overwhelming majority of the data that they're processing.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes thank you, it was a joke. Obviously I am aware nobody is being paid to watch porn.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I once was let go from a job in favor of someone who was later found to be spending most of their shifts watching porn. I don't know if they suffered consequences for that - they were offshore and had no on site supervision.

To be fair, that person was more qualified than I was at the time, but I didn't watch porn on the job, so ...

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It won't get everything but they don't even have to write a program cause DHT

[–] tal@olio.cafe 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I will point out that for the context of my comment, this is probably functionally equivalent


that is, if one has a piece of software to walk the DHT and build a list of torrents on it, it's probably still going to be done in a fully-automated fashion.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

I use bitmagnet, but it just scrapes the metadata

[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think you might be partially wrong. For training to work, you need to feed tags and descriptions for each piece you feed, so models can weight that input to something when they're asked to generate something. The data annotation and preparation is a big part of training, probably the most important one, and it's manually done by humans, probably in third world countries like mine. It's usually the big untold part of AI, the big human data entry part of it. I'm not entirely sure how it works for videos, but probably a lot of people were paid to watch porn and annotate all the videos by timestamp, to feed along with the video for the training to happen. AI is The Turk all the way down.