this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
42 points (93.8% liked)

Not The Onion

18226 readers
1538 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Questionable implementation but sound logic. Part of the reason EV fires are so hard to fight is you can't just dump water on them, they actually have to be buried and smothered in sand/dirt or something that will insulate it from air and control heat. And if the fire starts inside the vehicle, ejecting the battery away from the fire can keep the fire from getting 100x worse.

I don't know why you'd fire it sideways, directly at a sidewalk, at a few meters a second though. And not like, down and out the back. Make the rear bumper a pop-free folds down ramp lol

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

something that will insulate it from air

Just a quick clarification (I have run into my fair share of lithium battery fires and been doing a lot of research)

Insulating it from air doesn't stop air from getting to it. The battery has all the oxygen (air) it needs whether buried in sand, deep under water or out in space to continue it's catastrophic failure. The goal for being in sand, or having it suspended in an apparatus like one of those pouches or bags is to hopefully reduce the damage it does to the environment around it.

The more people understand how we really have no control once that thermal runaway starts the more people can protect themselves and hopefully find ourselves further away from these shitty ass designs.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

All EVs should have plumbing and an external water access point for firefighters. The current sealed designs are impossible to extinguish.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Switching to LiFePo and making the batteries easy to swap along a trip, is a better way to reduce fires.

Or solid state maybe? Not sure how flammable they are, but I know LiFePo are much lower risk than standard lithium ion (Nickle cobalt or whatever Tesla and the big Chevy trucks use )

Edited for spelling

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I started exploring more LiFePo4s, NiMH are sometimes a safer bet. We don't have many options out there unfortunately.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago

I know NiMH are way easier to charge, but lifepo4 has better capacity and way more charging cycles I believe.

The tricky thing with iron phosphate is that the voltage level between 75-80 and fully charged is very flat, so it’s difficult to reliably know the state of charge.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Solid state batteries are much safer, but much more expensive to make in facilities resembling chip fab clean rooms.