this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
142 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

75671 readers
3220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This Substack’s subdomain is blocked by my fake news filter so now I’m left wondering: who’s wrong?

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here's a more even-handed take from Wired: http://archive.today/uwx3J

They suppose that scamming/spamming is the main purpose behind the SIM farm, rather than deliberately crashing the cell network.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

The Wired story says the same thing but with more context and less "trust me, bro".

They are both interesting reads.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything that dude says passes the sniff test: it seems like it could be explained as a run of the mill criminal spamming operation. The Secret Service story doesn't offer evidence that there's anyone extraordinary about it.

FWIW the dude also makes a number of unsupported statements that seem to be "trust me bro, I'm a hacker". The statements aren't outlandish, so maybe.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 4 points 1 week ago

I think the mainstream news sources claiming this is some attack on the cellular networks and/or the UN are wrong for sure.

I’m not sure what he said but the headline makes it sound like the entire story (finding the equipment) is bogus.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The most telling detail is the least technical. Why include the distance to the UN when that number is 35 miles?