this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
1241 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

18183 readers
1961 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Even Jesus, who is God, sorta, didn't know when it would happen. He told his disciples he would return in their lifetime.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Didn't he technically return for a short bit?

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

He forgot to convert from God Time to mortal time. He was thinking they would live another couple dozen years or whatever, a thousand times as long as it took HimDadSelf to create the universe and speedrun evolution. Forgetting those the same kind of Days.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

From what I understand this is a common misconception

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The most common Christian apologetic is to say he was talking about the transfiguration. That fails because the language is clearly talking about his return. The early church clearly thought he was going to return in their lifetime. Also, the transfiguration a few days later. It's weird to say "some of you will still be alive in a few days"

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Would be funny if that's what he meant

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its literally what it says in the bible.

There's a lot of mental gymnastics Christians do to pretend this isn't true, but that is transparent and pathetic.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Apparently it's a case of misinterpretation and he was talking about the destruction of Herod's temple which happened in 70 AD

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

So, what got misinterpreted to turn "Herod's temple will be destroyed" into

“Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” ?

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

You need the context of what he said before that. He wasn't talking about his return he was talking about specific signs.

The problem with a lot of the Bible is that it is too easy to misinterpret. Its why biblical scholars exist.

Hell so much of it even requires historical context.

But for this specifically you jumped to the end of a long speech Jesus gave and ignored the body of it. And I don't blame you. It's easy to get lost in such a dull and antiquated collection of books.

It's why Young Earth Creationists think there are references to dinosaurs in the Old Testament. Lack of paying attention to a hard to follow text

But yes he was talking about the rise of Christianity and specific things that would come with it. Not his second coming.