this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
136 points (71.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hypx@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not really. It's mainly about gaining market dominance on a technology they think is the future. They'll build them right next to the massive coal plant alongside a million other things they're subsidizing.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Even if its not some altruistic reasons, they still are literally subsidizing this emissions reducing technology.

Tho they are also going pretty ham on subsidizing renewable energy too.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You won't be saying that once the market crashes. You'll realize that there are much better ways of spending that money. Like far more practical emissions reducing solutions.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How do subsidies=crash, and what are more effective emissions reductions solutions than renewable energy and electrifying transit?

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

You’re better off spending it on stuff like mass transit and the like. It won’t just all disappear at some point in the future.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

And we could be doing the same if we ditch big oil subsidies.