this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
436 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

76041 readers
3219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
436
4chan fined $26K for refusing to assess risks under UK Online Safety Act (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 day ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
167 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

If 4chan continues to ignore Ofcom, the forum could be blocked in the UK. And 4chan could face even bigger fines totaling about $23 million or 10 percent of 4chan’s worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. 4chan also faces potential arrest and/or "imprisonment for a term of up to two years," the lawsuit said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world -3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

LOL okay but you said:

now, do you still think the UK government has a right to fine 4chan or do you think maybe the UK government should elaborate on their prohibition regulations to ensure their citizens are properly “protected”?

I went ahead and edited it for you so it says enterprising individuals.... which you end up asking about 4chan anyways

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

still not reading it. you attempted to argue under false pretenses and I'm not wasting my time on something you probably used AI to generate.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

I didn't use AI at all.