this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
605 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

76228 readers
2882 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

"that breaks speed limits" can be ok.

I have seen a number of US interstates posted at 55mph, when traffic moves at 70-80mph. Being stuck at 55mph on those interstates is dangerous.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 54 points 3 days ago

The fact that this FSD mode comes with “more frequent lane changes” means it isn’t just keeping up with traffic. It’s designed to go faster than traffic. Stop making herr Elon’s points for him.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hear this argument a lot and I’m not disagreeing per se. But we should be clear. It can be dangerous for 1 out of 10 cars to be driving 55 instead of 75. But it would be safer by far if all 10 cars drove 55.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It can depend on your locale. I live in a country where outside of highways, posted speed limits are a joke. The cops would probably honk you if you were going the posted limit on a non highway road.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're at that level for a reason. The problem is that most people are ignorant or give little consideration to human life.

Thank you for explaining my country's specific traffic situation to me.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 22 points 3 days ago (36 children)

I do aknowledge that's always going to be the problem when we have the human + AI driver combinations.

Safest hypothetical is 100% AIs that always follow the same rules... next safest is humans that break the rules, but in a context aware situation (IE everyone going 70 in a 55, is safer than 1 car going 55 and all other cars going 70).

Real danger though is if the AI doesn't make good judgement calls when doing so. IE rather than deciding based on how fast other cars are going, it's primary determination is whether the user says they are in a hurry, leading it to sometimes be the one car going 55, but if the person is in a hurry it may be the only car going 70 on a road everyone else is going 55.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

it’s not just a matter of safety, efficiency also plummets above 55mph for very little benefit.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

You're talking about the "95 percentile" rule, right?

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Solid context that I hadn’t considered. Thanks.