this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
971 points (97.8% liked)

Not The Onion

18455 readers
3051 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can we just separate kids by skill level rather than gender? My middle school cis son loves playing sports, but he's not very good. He gets discouraged when the better kids bully him because of it.

[–] scala@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Skill based matchmaking. Most competitive video games use it. Why not IRL?

[–] potoo22@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now I'm imagining a kid scoring multiple points and the other parents calling him a smurf

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A little blue animated creature? Is that MMO lingo for pretending to be worse than you are like a "pool shark" or what not?

[–] scala@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

Smurfs happen more in shooters, or competitive games like Rocket League, Smash Bros etc. much less in MMO. It's easier to be a smurf when the game is skill based, and less or no dependency on what gear you own as it takes much longer to earn top tier gear that helps keep you at top.

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily MMOs but yes, you create an alternative account with the purpose of being matched with lesser skilled players.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't see why bottom tier teams shouldn't be co-ed. PE we did co ed sports days all the time and its more about getting exercise than winning.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe, for "rec league" or whatever, but school teams are usually meant to be competitive, and non-gendered sports would mean girls wouldn't have equitable access to athletics.

But even for non-competitive teams, girls are unlikely to be able to access shared sports to the same level as boys. At a party school I worked at, there was a major challenge with girls being willing to access open gym time, feeling uncomfortable advocating for access to basketball nets for practice—even girls who were on the competitive team felt they couldn't use open gym time.

TL;DR: Sexism runs deep. We need policies that recognize that and build equity, not just offer "equality" that perpetuates, or even magnifies, the problem.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

What's a party school?

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe we just need new sports.