this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
94 points (84.6% liked)

Technology

76564 readers
4800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/51970309

Rivian’s CEO praised the Xiaomi EV’s design after a teardown.

RJ Scaringe said he’d buy the SU7 himself if he lived in China.

He called it a well-integrated, nicely executed technology platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Get back to us when your health insurance company kicks you off your plan because your car has been reporting that you've been going to the bar 4 nights a week.

Or when your wife starts getting ads when connected to your home network for strippers and strip clubs because you parked the car near a strip club 1 time.

Or when your car starts suspiciously routing you through weird routes on maps, that take you close to the local fast food joints because Taco Bell/KFC paid them advertising money.

"But none of that happens right now!"

That's not the point. The point is, it could.

"It was labeled as a technology platform, I didn't think any of that technology would be used against me!"

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You think Tim Apple doesn't know how many times you jerk off or take a shit? Data privacy ended a decade ago.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

But for some reason you'd like to take it further. How odd.

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

He does. And it hasn't impacted me in the least bit. The worst thing that might have ever happened to me is my wife gets an ad for shit I've searched. So is certainly not without any downsides. But they are largely outweighed by the good for most people's use case. Most people shouldn't and don't give a fuck about the data tech has on them. What they should be concerned about is the government having data and a sane legal process for obtaining that data.

Cars with integrated tech are safer (assuming folks are going to cell phone either way, of course it would be better to actually ticket those folks but I digress) and improve the experience on a daily basis. That's what the average person wants.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 2 points 5 days ago

Username checks out

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh right, because that happened with your computer that's already following you for the past 15 years. I've met hundreds of people losing health insurance from the secret apps installed on phones and computers.

Y'all have to invent edge cases to make this stuff sound scary. Google has had the vast majority of everyone's movement for the past 15 years. Every day, every meter.

Sure there are downsides that people don't like but the vast majority of users don't care and aren't highly impacted.

The reality is folks want tech in their vehicles. They want it to integrate with their phones natively.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You ever watch scifi stuff and its kinda far fetched? Its because they're envisioning a future that hasn't happened yet. Its not an 'edge case' you just haven't been affected by it yet.

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry I'm confused by what you're hinting at with this reply, you're going to have to explain further.

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To signal I'm mostly done with this conversation in any sort of productive way after hearing the absurd notion that I should reference sci-fi as some prediction or validation for at best, edge cases if not entirely made up scenarios while entirely ignoring recent backlashes and legal action over the past few years where manufacturers have been told that is explicitly not okay. Event the FTC got up off their asses and did something.

Just imagine thinking a few allegories over the years which have come true isn't an absurd survivors bias and completely ignores the mounds of trash and shit that's great and still got it wrong is absurd.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Sorry man, still confused, can you explain more?