this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
819 points (99.5% liked)

Games

43105 readers
2680 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Minecraft: Java Edition has been obfuscated since its release. This obfuscation meant that people couldn’t see our source code. Instead, everything was scrambled – and those who wanted to mod Java Edition had to try and piece together what every class and function in the code did.

Modding is at the heart of Java Edition – and obfuscation makes modding harder. We're excited about this change to remove obfuscation, as it should make it quicker and easier for modders to create and improve mods. Now you won’t have to untangle tricky code or deal with unclear names. What’s more, de-bugging will become more straightforward, and crash logs will actually be readable!

surprisingly fantastic and consumer friendly move from mojang, good on them

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why not go open source? What are they so afraid of, given anyone can now see the source code by using a simple tool?

[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Open source includes unlimited distribution. The game is still paid and they want to reserve distribution rights.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Open-source and source-available are used interchangeably. Releasing the source does not mean the license will allow any form of redistribution or recompilation.

If you decompile the game yourself you can infinitely distribute the game as well. This is not an argument.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

No don't look it up, simply assume that you know what it means without ever seeing a definition because your brain is just better than everyone else's.

https://opensource.org/osd

The Open Source Definition
Page created on July 7, 2006 | Last modified on February 16, 2024

Introduction

Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code. The distribution terms of open source software must comply with the following criteria:

...

[–] XM34@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago

Open source and source available are not and cannot be used interchangeably. They mean two extremely different things!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 20 hours ago

The comment said why not go open source, not why not go source available though.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

To add to this, it's exclusively available on the Microsoft Store, which has gotten so bad lately that I refused the terms on their most recent update and haven't had it installed on any machines since.

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It isn't? Minecraft: Java Edition (which is getting deobfuscated) is available on their website for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Minecraft: Bedrock Edition has nothing to do with these news.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I could be mistaken but I'm 90% sure the website redirects you to buy it on the Microsoft Store, which is also how it will be installed and launched.

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

No it isn't. On Windows there are two versions of Minecraft. "Minecraft: Bedrock Edition" available as a UWP using the Microsoft Store, written in C++ and supporting crossplay with the Minecraft releases for consoles and mobile phones and "Minecraft: Java Edition" available through minecraft.net, written in Java and supporting crossplay with the MacOS and Linux versions.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you mean source available or actually open source?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean releasing the source under a license like GPL (or whatever the modern equivalent is).

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because then anyone could fork it and redistribute the game which I presume they don't want.

It would be sweet for us if they did, but I can see why they don't want to do that.

Things like Minetest exist.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They could distribute source ports of the game, but you'd still have to buy the game in order to make use of them. Textures, sound effects, animations, etc. are (usually) not source code.

That's why people still buy Doom 2 even though it was open-sourced in 1997.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

Fork it and use your own texture and sound pack doesn't sound like much work tbh. Any major modpack could just redistribute the game as a fork and it would be awesome. But Microsoft probably don't want that.

[–] sus@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The small amount of sales of doom 2 today is not at all comparable to the massive amount of minecraft sales and minecraft-related microtransactions that microsoft is raking in. Doom has many modern sequels that are far more popular today than doom 2, while minecraft does not have any official sequel.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

And Hytale got shitcanned!

It's actually amazing that in an industry so hell-bent on copying successful formulas ad-nauseam (e.g. Quake&Doom spawning the whole genre of First Person Shooters), Minecraft has not seen anything reach the status of spiritual successor in over 15 years of charts-topping sales performance. Not from its own studio, not from its former creator, not with the Late Hypixel Studios.

There are survival games and base-building games and exploration games, but none of them are "Minecraft-likes" in the way that early FPS were "Quake-likes". CS has Valorant. LoL has Dota. Tekken has Street Fighter. PUBG has Fortnite has Roblox. Minecraft somehow remains truly one-of-a-kind, a gaming UFO that eludes suits looking for a replicable formula. I actually believe Mojang themselves don't understand why Minecraft works in the first place either, which is why every update seemingly either underwhelms or angers everyone. That game is lightning in a bottle and no-one knows what to do with it.

If Nadella had a stroke so bad he decided to make Minecraft FOSS, I'd be really interested to see what would happen. If any for-profit company was allowed to make direct Minecraft derivatives, I do think we would see a level of creativity and innovation that would dwarf even the already extremely prolific current modding scene.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Open-sourcing Doom increased, rather than decreased sales.

Doom also went open source long before there were any sequels, and while it was still the hottest shit in PC gaming.

[–] C8r9VwDUTeY3ZufQRYvq@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What proportion of those sales are for Java edition? This sounds like an attempt to make mods and therefore java edition into a more popular/appealing product. They know that most users are not going to do anything with source code.

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I thought they were still hoping to convince people to use Bedrock so they had to buy Windows.

[–] C8r9VwDUTeY3ZufQRYvq@sopuli.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

I admit I also thought they were trying to basically replace java edition with bedrock, so I'm not sure. Just trying to make sense of this move without assuming that Microsoft is being nice about something

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I'd love to see that but realistically I don't ever see it happening.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 3 points 1 day ago

I doubt that, but going source available is more likely imo.