this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
668 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

18529 readers
971 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“He did it. He threw the sandwich.”

That’s how the defense counsel for Sean Dunn, the man who threw a sub-style sandwich at a Border Patrol officer in Washington, DC, this summer began the federal trial against him Tuesday morning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] klemptor@startrek.website 242 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

I cannot believe we're wasting taxpayer dollars on a ballistic hoagie attack.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 7 points 10 hours ago

It's just a shame it wasn't a lead sandwich traveling at 1500 fps

[–] socsa@piefed.social 162 points 19 hours ago (5 children)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

...take my upvote...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

intercontinental ballistic mayonaisse

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago
[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 11 points 17 hours ago

This is so good it should be illegal.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 80 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

"ballistic submarine missile" was right there

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Haha being gay is bad amirite

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago

It's not being gay, it's being a bunch of hypocrites about being gay that deserves the ridicule

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

No, every representation of human sexuality can be beautiful (with consent that is). Just wordplay with one of the multiple terms for sub, hero, blimp, torpedo and yes, grinder.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I'm sure we all know the phrase that a prosecutor could get a grand jury to "indict a ham sandwich". It took prosecutors THREE Grand Juries to finally get an indictment for someone throwing that sandwich.

It's all a complete waste of time and taxpayer funds, and in any other point in history these prosecutors would have been fired immediately for incompetence at even considering an indictment in the first place, not even considering the possibility that they would try for three attempts.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 58 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They never got the indictment. The prosecutor had to downgrade the charges from a felony to a misdemeanor, which doesn’t have to go before a grand jury.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

if a grand jury won't indict, doesn't double jeopardy apply? not a lawyer, just haven't dealt with this part of the process before

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 hours ago

A grand jury is a sort of sanity check on a charge, and does not count towards the trial. It is basically "with these facts (provided only by the prosecution), is there enough probable cause to move a case to trial?". Double jeopardy in the 5th amendment has specific protections from going to trial multiple times or from getting multiple purchasing for a crime.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't even realize that, last I had heard was them putting it before the third jury, and then that there was going to be a trial.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 32 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Actually, it's even stupider than that I'm pretty sure, two grand juries refused to give them an indictment for a felony charge, so they brought a way less severe misdemeanor charge because you don't have to get a grand jury to sign off on those, and that's what we're wasting this time on

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 7 points 12 hours ago

As it so happens, they can indict ham sandwiches, but not turkey subs. And I think this is arguably funnier.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago

I hope a news outlet has the boldness to run this story after one showing DHS brutality, including the taxpayer costs, and before one about SNAP, healthcare and the shutdown. This administration is well past the point of pissing on Americans while telling them it's raining.

[–] derry@midwest.social 15 points 19 hours ago

Dear Lord don't you know this will lead to ICBMs! Intercontinental ballistic meatballs are nothing to be trifled with. Next they'll add mozzarella to them

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 12 points 18 hours ago

ballistic hoagie attack

Band name

[–] milkisklim@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

If it makes you feel any better, because of the shutdown, we aren't spending money on this. \s