this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
375 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another useful feature for power users that Google is killing.

They don't care about us that day they we have a problem and the solution is in a now defunct site. That doesn't generate revenue. "When People search on Google they need to find what they need on a click on the ads", the shareholders are saying

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Another paid service that has no reason not to enshittify

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What is the alternative if we need a searchable index of the internet? Self host? Participate in a community driven swarm? Is that possible or even feasible for us to do? I'd love to see such a thing. It would be quite interesting to learn about the architecture of it, especially ways that the tech prevents gaming the search results, but I have yet to see something like that.

Or are you suggesting that internet search should be done by a non-profit or government agency that we fund with tax dollars? Even the internet archive struggles to stay alive.

Edit: yay, no answers (ie: no alternatives to a for-profit company driven search engine), just angry downvotes, haha

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you figure out how to search "correctly" on SearXNG instances, some of them are pretty good (though they source part of their results from google). That's how I search most of the time nowadays. I've found a favourite instance and a few backups. My most important advice is: to change the default language from "auto" to "en", and only change it to some other locale for results specifically in that language/country.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If I understand correctly, isn't that just a meta search that is using corporate results as the back end?

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is indeed, but in my experience it's somehow better than the corporate backends at presenting the "correct" results to me.

this has been my experience with paulgo.io with the exception of images, which i sometimes have to use google for

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Honestly, I hope it's around long enough. Right now it's very good and rapidly improving. Enshittification by definition only happens when a service is large enough and successful enough. Until that happens, I'm going to keep using what for me is the best search option.

Let's face it. Search is a fundamental necessity of the internet. How many models can functionally work?

  • It could be free for the user, but supported by ads. We've seen how that works. Maybe it's run its course.

  • It could be ad-free and paid for by users. The competitive incentive at least is to give users the best possible experience.

  • It could be entirely free and provided as a utility. Literally no one is asking for a government run Internet.

  • Maybe there's some futuristic solution like an Open Source distributed network in which users run the search themselves. As far as I know nobody has come up with a search that doesn't require a massive database with enormous costs.