this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
1121 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
81451 readers
4451 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For anyone reading this currently, it appears that regulation bans any form of encryption over HAM radio broadcasts. So I guess that's one reason this won't work.
How would they find out ?
A high powered antenna that transmits a lot of "static" would be a dead giveaway.
It's not really static. It's digital, the transmission scheme has structure. It's only the transmitted data that is encrypted, but you'd have to first unpack the transmission to get to the data.
I understand. I was replying to how gov agencies would find out. Any digital transmission is basically "static" to an analog receiver.
True, you could send encrypted data via morse code. Nothing but a pure tone.
Regulations can be changed?
It's also slow AF. It's potentially faster to have someone read you text than get it by packet over radio.