this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
531 points (95.5% liked)

Greentext

7653 readers
340 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most of that makes sense but

  • Consider getting better pictures for online dating account -> this would be misleading and catfishing. Your pictures should be an authentic representation of who you are.

That's silly. It's completely normal to try and show your best self on dating sites. Unflattering pictures usually either come off as laziness, or like you're just so ugly that those ARE flattering pictures. So long as you aren't using edited pictures, or pictures of someone else that's not catfishing.

[โ€“] blarghly@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

I mean, all of the above points are silly. The issue isn't the actual percieved constraints - it is the belief that these constraints are real and/or insurmountable.

For example, talking to a random attractive person in a public place because you are interested in them isn't weird, rude, or unpleasant for them. Well, maybe it's a bit weird these days, but as long as you are polite and genial about it, it's the good kind of weird that makes you stand out from the crowd. Of course, you can make the whole interaction unpleasant, but former-me's problem was that he assumed it would be, full stop.

The fact is that the above list is a list of genuine problems and concerns. But these are problems to be solved, not absolute barriers to action.