this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
237 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4690 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Imaging if this technology could cool a data centre.

Edit: I was not involved in this project. You are wasting your time asking me questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No it said it does it without refrigerant.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The headline reads "A new cooling technology freezes food without warming the climate". It doesnt mention the lack of (gaseous) refrigerent.
The thing about machines that make them bad for the environment in general is the fact that they use up energy, which is nowadays still mostly created in a process that also releases massive amounts of CO2.
Its unlikely that the environmental impact of the gaseous refrigerent is as big as the impact of the CO2 that is created to run the fridge over its lifetime. It makes sense then to assume this fridge doesnt use power, since right now thats the only way it could cool without heating up the planet.

Im not saying this tech isnt interesting, but the headline is total BS

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Old school refrigerants were absolutely horrendous ghg even modern ones are pretty bad with R134 being 1430x worse of a ghg than CO2

If we can reduce that, that’s good! And metals like titanium are recyclable so yes initially extracting them is bad but the full lifecycle isn’t as terrible

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Modern refrigerants don't use R134

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://www.freon.com/en/industries/refrigeration/residential-refrigeration

R134 was the “safe” refrigerant to replace R-12 because R12 is 11000x more potent of a ghg than co2

There are some new refrigeration units that use R600 but the vast majority of refrigerators are still R134

R600 being a highly flammable gas (it’s butane) has slowed its rollout a lot. Hence why a solid state non volatile refrigerant is still a cool development

In EU new installments using refrigerants with GWP of over 150 will be straight up banned next year, at least for home usage