302
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
302 points (99.7% liked)
Not The Onion
19512 readers
1955 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh no! My speculative buying of shitloads of MTG cards to make money selling the good ones is failing! People might have access to the best cards without spending copious amounts of money to middlemen! It’s very dangerous to the game if people can be good at it without it being rich!
i heard its quite expensive now to get into physical MTG, because of the chase cards of UB. they also dont have easy physical to online mtg pipeline either.
It's not the card speculators suing, it's the corpo investors.
The way I read the article, the plaintiff is both, but it doesn't explicitly say that. It just makes sense that plaintiff is both a player, using the scarcity to their advantage, and also an investor in the company -- i.e. losing $$$ in both cases. I'll be curious to see if this suit goes anywhere.
To be fair, the reserve list's existence has set the precedent that WotC approves of this behavior at least a little.
To also be fair, the last time the reserve list was updated was 2010, and the newest card that's on the reserve list is from 1999.
I mean, you joke, but this isn't an unreasonable critique. A big component of the MTG popularity boom was the regular distribution chain, necessitating a huge constellation of second-hand collectors and traders. Overproducing deck-specific cards that flood the market destroys the baseload of people buying cards from the retailer.
Hasbro is effectively eating its own seed corn. It's fucking over the people who will buy a thousand boxes of crap looking for half a dozen copies of the card that sells secondhand for a profitable margin.
Outside a few niche vintage and legacy tournaments, you can be very good at the game without needing to own the highest end cards. Plenty of people run pauper decks that can outperform the high end decks when played with a working knowledge of what those high end decks try to do (ie, The Meta). Mono-green elves and mono-red goblins have dominated the game space practically since its inception. You'll rarely find a release year where you struggle to build one of these decks for less than $50. And that's assuming you and a few friends don't draft regularly and luck into the right cards, then trade among yourselves to build a winning board.
What Hasbro is doing is more akin to the Louvre coming out with identical print copies of high end auctioned paintings. I'd say the bigger complaint isn't that they're doing this so much as that they're getting in on a game third-party forgers have been playing for decades.
You can go online and find an Unlimited series duplicate Mox Emerald for maybe $20. And it'll pass muster at any game table in America that doesn't have a professional on staff to check its print number.
Talking budget decks and then quoting a budget format is misleading when talking about price to pay magic. So is using proxy prices when talking about the prices wizards is setting.
The standard budget deck right now is 500$ (Izzet Lessons)
(Standard) Sultai Reanimator is 850$
(Standard) Bant Airbending is 800$
(Standard) Simic Ouroboroid is 900$
(Modern) Boris Energy is 850$
(Modern) Belcher is 350-450$
(Modern) Amulet Titan is 950$
Vivi cauldron led to a one deck standard and cost about 1000$
Wizards pricing and printing policy has led to only proxy/casual formats and budget formats being affordable to play. It’s why formats like Pioneer are basically dead and standard is nearly on life support at local most LGS. My metro area has dropped standard night from all but one game store.
You can build Black/Red Blight Goblins for $21 or a Mono-Blue Towns deck for $20. Both play competitively.
That's because Vivi Ornitier runs $100/ea and Agatha's Soul Cauldron runs another $130/ea. Don't build a deck where a single card is going to run you three figures. Problem solved.
Well, that and the online scene cutting into the physical game's player base, sure.
Competitive where? At the LGS the weaker end of decks you are going to run into for standard are things like bunnies, boros burn, collectors cage, landfall, temur combo, roots, dimir tempo, mono white tokens, esper control, sultai control, and esper/dimir self bounce.
Most of these decks are still expensive because any mythic play piece right now is expensive and deck defining.
Many playable uncommons like stock up and boltwave are multiple dollars a pop.
Most of these decks are using play pieces that are printed for commander or other eternal formats that keep prices high.
The land base in standard is crazy expensive. All of the uncommon lands are tap lands that cause you to die on the spot to aggro decks since standard is a turn 3-4 format and the land base is largely coming from either shock lands that are expensive as they are good in nearly every format, verges that are underprinted, and starting town/multiversal that are underprinted.
For me it was the combination of burn-out from trying to get "good" at MTG while best results being top eight in GPQs, PTQs, and perhaps day two in GPs, and the focus on EDH. Tried dipping my toe in last year and just being overwhelmed by the insane amount of product. Even within the same set. For me part of the fun was "solving" the limited formats for each set. But now draft is its own boosters?
I've never noticed a print number on my mox or lotus. And I got them in 92 from flow-packs.
Ah, my mistake. They didn't even do collector numbers until Exodus. God damn, that's crazy in hindsight. Makes counterfeiting almost trivial.
We regularly planed the face off cards - like forests - and glued on a colour copy of a pricey card in its place.
But since we were good people, and even though the fakes would fool a kid or a noob, and even shuffle and cut the same, we intentionally sprinkled the copier with yellow confetti so each fake would have some obvious yellow dots.
And we'd ensure everyone knew: "these 6 cards are proxies for these other 6 cards, and in an ante game you win the real card with the proxy. Fair?" It was usually cool.
Our white-hat counterfeiting game was on point. And card sleeves were lame. ;-)
I mean, I played with people who would just scrawl the name of the card over the top of another card in sharpie. Some of them even had a real copy of a card (bricked up in some two inch thick display case), but others would just be - like - "This is a card I wish I had" and we'd have fun playing because it's fun to be across the table from someone with Power Nine tech.
Last time I was active was 10 years ago just as EDH was taking off. Buying the expensive early cards necessitated quite a lot of knowledge and a decent jewelers loupe. I can just imagine how hard it is today with the counterfeiters getting better.