this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
357 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4201 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/41122324

Google did not admit wrongdoing in the settlement of the class-action case, which accused the firm of "unlawful and intentional interception and recording of individuals’ confidential communications without their consent and subsequent unauthorized disclosure of those communications to third parties."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 38 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I was originally part of this class-action. When the lawyers decided to settle I refused to accept the settlement, purely because Google admitted no fault and also required us to agree that we couldn't ever sue over the issue again in the future even if new evidence came to light. The dollar amount they offered wasn't tiny (it wasn't large by any means either), but I felt it was in no way a valid amount for what was being claimed. Not to mention the lawyers were taking close to or maybe more than half of the settlement money, which I find offensive considering they decided to settle the case and allow Google to wash their hands of the matter. Luckily I reserved my right to sue again in the future, but I'd either have to go at it alone or try to form a new class-action suite. I'm still incredibly disappointed that the lawyers handling the case backed down and took the settlement, I would have rather lost the case and discovered the truth than take a pittance and let Google off.

Edit: I almost forgot, the most aggregious requirement to the settlement was the non-disclosure agreement that you had to accept which meant you couldn't say anything at all about the settlement or the case if you took the money. It also appeared to me that they were trying to apply the non-disclosure even if you didn't take the settlement, which I don't know how you can be held to a NDA if you haven't signed and accepted the NDA. The whole thing smelled of bullshit to me.

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

One would almost start to think the lawyers were out for the settlement money...

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 5 points 8 hours ago

Oh, come on, not all lawyers are vultures who exploit the law for their own financial gain. Some of them are retired, or dead.

[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

It was definitely the path that required the least amount of effort from them and they happily pocketed near 50% of the settlement.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's a shameless plutocracy at this point. The mask is off, no one is pretending to follow the rules.

[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Deleted replied to the wrong comment.