this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
237 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

19599 readers
528 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@mander.xyz 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Prosecutors said Hughes had been drinking and watching the Kansas City Chiefs defeat the Philadelphia Eagles in the Super Bowl at the bar that night, along with Brewer. After leaving the bar, Hughes urinated on the rear wall of the building.

Lloyd Preston Brewer III, who owns the building but not the bar, confronted Hughes and then shot him once in the torso, killing him. He later claimed that he had acted in self-defense, telling police he feared for his life when he saw a group of people gathering in the parking lot and noticed Hughes urinating on the wall.

“He came at me in a threatening manner and appeared he was reaching for something on his side,” Brewer told police, according to The Miami Herald. Brewer said he warned Hughes before drawing his weapon.

But prosecutors said security footage and eyewitness testimony directly contradicted that account.

“There is no justifiable claim to self-defense because the kid was never armed and never advanced on the shooter, the shooter advanced on him,” Assistant Monroe County State Attorney Joseph Mansfield said.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He tried the cop defense, right down to the contradicting video evidence. Guess it only works for them.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Honestly lying about a shooting should double the time in prison and qualify it as a murder. There is no world where the gamble murderers should be making is saying they were scared. Guns aren't stuffed animals and people shouldn't be owning them because they're scared. Anyone making that claim to shoot an unarmed person (including cops) should be barred from ever owning a gun because they are safety hazard.

It should be them saying "I was so angry I saw only red, I didn't mean to shoot him" to try and get manslaughter instead of murder.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everything else aside: fearing for one's life is the single best reason to use a weapon I can come up with, pretty sure that's why it's such a common lie