this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
567 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
4202 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Mozilla has issued a warning about Microsoft's design practices, claiming that the company uses harmful design tactics to influence users to switch to its Edge browser.
  • The report highlights how Microsoft interrupts the installation process of Google Chrome on Windows devices, promoting the security and privacy benefits of Edge.
  • Mozilla calls for regulatory action to restore browser choice and competition across major platforms.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/koBY6


Chrome

Windows

Well there's your problem!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 67 points 9 months ago (4 children)

EU fined the sh1t out of them, and somebody in the regulatory body at the time realized that was not enough. So they were ordered to present the user with a choice of a browser during the OS install.

What I really want to know is why and how it went away.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago (2 children)

sh1t

You can say "shit" here, nobody is going to be a cunt about it.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 18 points 9 months ago

What I really want to know is why and how it went away.

The move was in place because of the fear that IE was becoming a monopoly. Now Edge is very very far from the most popular browser, and Google Chrome is looking like the overwhelmingly dominant player, there's no reason to make MS prompt people to download rival products anymore.

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

INAL but my understanding was a lot of the fines and penalties hung on IE being part of the OS. I think it was the update functionality but don't quote me.

So with some legal technicalities, later versions of windows made it "not" part of the OS just a bundled application. A legal distinction without meaning but it meant they didn't need to do these things anymore.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

The great joke is they are making the same mistakes again with edge, unfortunately the American justice system is a shambles these days so it's probably down to the EU to take the moral high ground.

Microsoft appear to be exposed to monopolistic penalties in several markets currently: browsers, AI / search, teams and office come to mind (although competitors are lacking, here)

[–] MenacingPerson@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Could be I'm Not A Lawyer. We call that an "IANAL Contraction"

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know what it means, but everytime I think it sounds like screaming a new Apple product.

[–] nintendiator@feddit.cl 4 points 9 months ago

iAnal, now that'd get the Apple fanboys going.

[–] madis@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I think it will be back this March with the new laws (Digital Markets Act).