this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
236 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

80916 readers
4624 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -3 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

The question always struck me as dumb. Because it doesn't make any attempt to clarify what geographic region this question takes place.

I don't care what you're afraid of a man doing, a polar bear is ALWAYS the worse choice.

But not all bears are as aggressive as polar bears. Some bears will run away from you if you chase them. Some bears will end you if you chase them.

Of coarse you can't determine how dangerous a man is based on region. But you can likely determine which regions have dangerous bears.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 31 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Without wading into all the technicalities, could we perhaps agree that if you have to say, "what kind of bear tho'," that we are already in troubling territory?

Oh, wow, that is actually a really good point!

Me bringing polar bears into the thought experiment was intended as a (really stupid) joke, but I had nonetheless taking seriously that technically it should matter what kind of bear we are talking about. You've demolished that angle with your comment, though!

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I would take “worse than a panda” as a compliment, but I understand your point.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It's ironic we're dissecting which kind of bear is dangerous, while implicitly accepting the premise that all men are dangerous.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If the dangerous men were as easily distinguishable from the not dangerous ones as bear species, then the answer would be different. Because that's women's entire point - you often can't tell until it's too late

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Has anybody looked into the possibility that we put down all these dangerous creatures before more people get hurt? Better safe than sorry.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's not at all what is implied by the thought experiment. It's not all men, it's a random man. And it's not that they are dangerous, it's about what feels riskier from a woman's perspective.

That's why all the fretting over which kind of bear is missing the point. It's not about arguing with women that they are wrong, it's about listening to them and understanding that they have no idea whether the man is the sort that would kill them if they say or do or don't do the right thing — but the odds are sufficient that all men must be treated like a potential threat.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

It's not all men, it's a random man. And it's not that they are dangerous, it's about what feels riskier from a woman's perspective.

How is that different? It's still a prejudice based on somebody's unalterable trait. The entire premise is a deliberate generalization to place men and wild animals into the same category.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Do polar bears occupy habitat that could realistically be called “the woods”?

I always assumed this question was referring to a brown bear - black bears are pussies and polar bears are instadeath. Pandas are adorable, obviously better than meeting a man. Other species are unlikely for most english speaking people to meet in the woods. Brown bears are the only species that make this question interesting.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 4 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Where I'm from, you're just as likely to get a polar bear as a black or brown bear in the woods. So it's all unrealistic.

[–] Arctic_monkey@leminal.space 2 points 7 hours ago

A polar bear in the woods? They're an aquatic mammal that lives on sea ice... Where are you from?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

a black bear did drop on a hunter and killed it in the news last year.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Would you rather have a man drop on you in the woods or a black bear?

[–] shads@lemy.lol 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You forgot the Dropbears. Want to reassess relative threat levels of the various species of alpha predator?

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah I'd pick a man of a dropbear any day 🐨🩸☠️

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It presumes black bear. You're over thinking it.

Then say a black bear. It presumes nothing.