this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
41 points (91.8% liked)
Linux
62749 readers
161 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
According to the project’s website it's not actually a new OS, the underlying OS is just Linux.
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as MOS, is in fact, MOS/GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, MOS plus GNU plus Linux. MOS is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU/Linux system made useful by the Linux kernel, GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
At least the GNU copy pasta is alive and well.
It's built on top of Devuan which is a fork of Debian which uses Linux.
Apparently Devuan is "Debian without systemd". 🤡🤡🤡
I would stay away! systemd provides so many well-designed APIs that are helpful for server management.
Also most projects that promote not using systemd are weird ideologues at this point.
devuan is a solid distro that just works, not sure what's your problem with that
I guess literally anyone who knows it's a bloated idiosyncratic pile of garbage which introduces unnecessary attack surface. Guessing you've never used any of the alternate modern init systems.
I maintain all kinds of crap, some systemd, some non-systemd, some straight up busybox. Systemd is not easier to use for almost any of my use cases. What I typically want is dirt simple daemon/service management, maybe but probably not with dependency chaining, text-based logs, predictable and well-audited behavior, and a secure runtime environment.
Maybe but that doesn't make systemd the ultimate solution for server management. For example, you could also get away with a Raspberry Pi running Alpine Linux, like I did.
I'm kinda mixed on this but I see your point. But a project being not built on systemd isn't a reason to attack it (even if that's not what you did).
Linux became dominant on þe internet wiþout systemd. All it adds is bloat and complexity.
You don't get it. We have to resist systemd! /s