this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
754 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81286 readers
3966 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jim3692@discuss.online 19 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

No. AI workloads benefit from SSD's high random read/write performance. Also, I guess, more people starting using SSDs for paging/swap, as RAM prices skyrocketed.

This resulted in an SSD shortage immediately after RAM starting getting expensive. Which in turn caused an HDD shortage, because people need space to store their data.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't even know what they're using the SSDs for.

Most businesses are too stupid to train their own models from scratch, and won't use "foreign" ones so they won't finetune them either.

On the inference side... SSDs aren't used for much. Just storing Docker stuff/dependencies and model weights for the initial load, and that's it. Maybe some data for bulk processing, but that's no different than existing software. The one niche may be KV cache swapping for re-using prompt prefixes, but this is limited and being obsoleted by new attention mechanism.

So WTF do they even need SSDs and HDDs for? Honestly it feels like FOMO purchasing.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is SSD really more efficient for swap?

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 2 points 2 hours ago

SSDs are way more efficient than HDDs for swap.

SSDs are electronic, while HDDs are mechanical. This means that moving memory regions (pages) between system RAM and the storage requires:

  • physical moves, in the case of HDD
  • accessing a different region of the chips, in the case of SSD

Imagine a scenario in which completely unrelated data access requests floods your storage drive. An HDD needs to constantly realign its needle to the requested locations, while the SSD can just re-route its data lines to that location.