Technology

82188 readers

3984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

1057

Tesla Robotaxis Reportedly Crashing at a Rate That's 4x Higher Than Humans (gizmodo.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

175 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 80 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Nah, that one's on Elon just being a stubborn bitch and thinking he knows better than everybody else (as usual).

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (19 children)

He's right in that if current AI models were genuinely intelligent in the way humans are then cameras would be enough to achieve at least human level driving skills. The problem of course is that AI models are not nearly at that level yet

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I am a Human and there were occasions where I couldn't tell if it's an obstacle on the road or a weird shadow...

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. In theory cameras should be enough to get you up to human level driving competence but even that is a low bar.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I feel like camera only could theoretically pass human performance, but that hinges entirely on AI models that do not currently exist, and that those models, when they do exist, are capable of running inside of a damn car.

At that point, it'd be cheaper to just add LiDAR...

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

This is all true

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (16 replies)

load more comments (17 replies)