this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
886 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

20584 readers
854 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trongod_requiem0432@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just out of interest: Would U.S.-Americans be allowed to found a non-profit health insurance organization?

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Allowed to, sure. But it would quickly be crushed by the companies that have way more resources to draw on...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah the better option is for a multi state compact for a public option. I know Washington has a bit of a public option. That said, you get no subsidies if your employer offers minimum contributions to the health insurance of their choosing.

Edit to finish the thought: we need universal single payer, but barring that we need public options and real choice, including choice over where to apply our employer's contributions. It wouldn't fix everything that universal single payer would, but it would enable you to have the freedom to not need to change doctors every time you get a new job.

[–] Ageroth@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago

Allowed? Technically yes, in the same way people are allowed to start local broadband co-ops or like grocery stores or whatever else.
The problem comes when you have to actually make people aware you exist and have a service or product for sale, and "compete" with the national/multi-national corporation who have infinitely more resources than you do.

Just look at how Walmart and now Amazon have put just about every mom and pop shop out of business. They can move in, drop prices so low locally long enough to put you out of business because they have other areas locked down already and covering the losses. Then once they have the market locked up they can charge whatever they want because you have no other options.

Almost certainly there already exists a non-profit health insurance organization, they just don't have the resources to advertise on all the major channels and across the interwebs like all the predatory ones do.