this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
92 points (95.1% liked)

Fediverse

40491 readers
701 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vote manipulation is getting more common. Some recent examples:

While the accounts were banned, the malicious voting activity stuck around.

Should admins have the ability to discard votes, and if so, which admins? Should community mods have that ability? Can you think of any ways that tools like this could be abused?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social -2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (5 children)

Do away with voting altogether and force people to think for themselves instead of just following the easily manipulated herd. Always sort by New Comments with no other options so the only things at the top are active discussions.

This also would make it so lurkers can't influence the conversations they don't actively participate in.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

What's the virtue of everyone taking part in a conversation even when they have nothing substantive to add?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social -1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Who said you have to participate? Not interested? Move on.

What is the virtue in liking or disliking a thing you're not going to otherwise engage with? Why should others dictate what you are more likely to actually see?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Who said they weren't interested? Your entire premise is based on them being interested.

So again, what's the virtue in everybody having to comment even if they don't have some substantive to say?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Who said they weren't interested? Your entire premise is based on them being interested.

I don't even know how you came to this conclusion. If you're not interested in the discussion, and you're not going to participate in it, why should you get to influence how others may see the content by voting on it and affecting its visibility? That's the premise.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)