this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
242 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

81759 readers
4236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Objectification, hate, rape threats: the politicians debating online abuse mean well, but to truly understand, they need to see what I see

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry what? Tech billionaires don't have to enable the free speech of sexually harassing a child online.

And if your argument is that sexually harassing a child online is "free speech" - and that's the best argument you have - that's not a good argument.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

My argument is that it's illegal for the govt to regulate such speech.

What kind of accountability were you referring to? Were you expecting tech billionaires to hold themselves accountable?

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The article is from a UK newspaper. What is and isn't legal for them to regulate is decided by their Parliament and nobody else. No Kings, and all that.

Meanwhile, you should know that the "free speech" lectures are getting pretty old from the country that checks social media history at the border to make sure you didn't say anything bad about the Dear Leader, which shuts down TV shows it doesn't like, and generally ensures the media toes the party line.

(See also - lectures on why kids shooting up schools is a necessary price to pay for that well regulated militia that will be along to save you from tyrants, well, real soon now...)

[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

from the country that checks social media history at the border to make sure you didn't say anything bad about the Dear Leader

That's also illegal. A rational person would argue to prevent that. An irrational person would suggest that it means we should move deeper into anarchy.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Go yell "fire" in a crowded theater, or "i have a bomb" on an airplane and see just how quickly the government regulates your speech.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Common misconception. That's not illegal. Nor is it what's happening.