this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
14 points (64.6% liked)

Technology

81802 readers
4392 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
14
20 Years of Banning Phones. We Don’t Have That Long for AI. (pulletsforever.com)
submitted 13 hours ago by davidwkeith@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I co-teach AP Computer Science A through Microsoft's TEALS program. The classroom runs on Chromebooks, Google Classroom, and code.org (AWS). Corporate infrastructure top to bottom. This year I added an AI tutor. That's apparently the controversial part.

The research is interesting: a Wharton study found students using standard ChatGPT performed 17% worse on exams—the "crutch" effect. But students using AI with pedagogical guardrails showed no negative effect. The problem isn't AI in education. It's unguided AI. So I built a tutor that asks probing questions instead of giving answers. I'm sharing the prompt I use and how to set one up yourself.

While, China made AI education mandatory for six-year-olds this year. We're still deciding whether to block ChatGPT.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pfr@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This article reads like it was written entirely by AI, and I'm willing to bet the "Promt Author" won't deny this either given their promotion of AI. Its not just the em dashes, there's a particular AI vernacular that's becoming more and more obvious.

I don't disagree with the idea that we need to prepare our future generations for the rapidly changing world of technologies etc, but like most others in the comments, I'm sceptical about embracing these technologies without careful consideration for what it means for generational knowledge and human intelligence in general.