this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
1597 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
5040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Raglan@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

how far the mighty have fallen to be compared unfavorably to aliexpress. sheesh.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aliexpress search results are garbage. A dozen knockoffs of the same thing, sorting doesn't work, and when you search for a specific part it shows you the price of the right product but the wrong variety.

But it's cheaper than Amazon, cuts out Bezos, and for standard shipping is usually about as fast.

[–] Raglan@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cancelled prime a while back and I've been mostly trying to order direct from manufacturers when possible. Costs more but I figure that's the price of not contributing to a known bad actor in some small way.

Thanks for the summary. I'll keep in in mind if I can't find a more direct route.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

It's probably still cheaper than prime. It hasn't been worth the money for me for years. I still try to buy from local businesses that deserve support first, though.