this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
443 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
5040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] linule@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Why is there no privacy respecting solution for age verification? Like the government giving you some sort of token that says you’re over 18 and that’s it?

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 33 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

What if I told you that by regulation, the EU age verification system has to be anonymous and that it’s only the AUKUS countries that are moving forward in a way where anonymity is “a nice to have”.

Denmark’s system, which is a front-runner implementation in the EU, is going to be fully ZKP.

And yes it’s basically built with tokens.

You identify with a government system in an app. The services issues you signed tokens that are anonymous. You hand these anonymous tokens over to the sites that demand proof of age.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 5 hours ago

How are you supposed to abuse the data of people that you can't even identify...?

[–] linule@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

That sounds great. I don’t follow the topic closely (probably I should), so wasn’t aware of these developments. This should be brought up in all discussions about age verification, so everyone knows there are better options.

Some people will feel that it’s not ideal, as you still have to trust the government, opposed to full anonymity, but that is a bit of a separate problem.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ultimately someone has to vouch for “yes, this person is 18+”. People can’t self-attest, except through crappy biometric, so at some point a government ID has to be involved.

I’d trust my government over a credit reference agency that literally makes revenue from selling access to your private data.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yes, and governments, at least democratic ones, represent the interests of their people, so at least on paper this is the correct way to structure things. Then you use the channels to government to ensure it’s regulated properly. If this is not possible or there’s no trust, there’s a larger problem.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 36 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because its not about age verification, its about tracking and controlling you and making a privacy respecting solution isn't compatible with that.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

So there should be a rebuttal demanding a privacy respecting age verification token, instead of just arguing against age verification, which technically does have a point. This way it’s disabled as excuse to sneak in the other things.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

No, we still need to be against it. I said tracking and controlling, not just tracking.

They are already blocking resources that shouldn't be blocked from youth, and even a privacy centric method would still let them do that, and then expand it to anything at a whim in the future.

We don't want the internet built on this infrastructure, it would br a disaster.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay, it’s 2 topics then, the privacy, and basically adding a mandatory authorization layer to the internet derived from your real identity.

To some extent this already exists for movies or say to buy alcohol, getting a driving license etc. in the real world, where people often also have to verify their age. So here it could be asked on what exact basis the internet should work differently.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The basis is its how the world communicates and they become the gate keepers to communication and knowledge. Its like book banning on topics they don't like but on a scale much more massive.

They're already banning internet content from people that shouldn't be about sexual health because its not about protecting kids its about controlling them and people.

You gotta be a good sheep and they're going to do their best to make you one.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Not saying that these are not possibilities, but the technology itself and mistrust of government are, at least partly, different things. This is definitely a complex topic, spanning a lot of topics.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

the technology itself and mistrust of government are, at least partly, different things

I don't personally think so when it comes to technologies like this that can be used to surveil and/or control a population (edit: and especially that are being heavily driven by governments)

It's pretty much a given that it will be used against us as history has shown us its always the case.

Trying to separate them out, gives them the extra support they need to pass it through and then abuse it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because then you can share the token and everyone can use it

I'm sure a more robust solution is possible though.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Personal ids can also be used by non-owners, not much different than this theoretic age verification token. But yeah, ideally it would have a security layer to sufficiently confirm ownership.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago

Ah tbh I just realised that with the tokens being unique you could still limit accounts per token to 1, achieving the same effect as using real ID.

[–] Jimmytea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

There is!, one of the officially recognised and approved ways is credit card verification, however afaik only steam is doing that.

[–] JenitalJouster@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

i’ve seen screenshots of ios users being verified due to having their credit cards as payment methods tied to their name, which is a hell of a lot better than an ID

[–] linule@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I mean a dedicated, government issued age verification token that doesn’t reveal any data to the third party other than you are allowed access age wise.